My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-22-1995 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1995
>
02-22-1995 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2023 3:31:02 PM
Creation date
9/27/2023 3:26:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE WONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />meeting held on JANUARY 17, 1995 <br />(M6 - «19«8 Kenneth J. Severinson - Continued) <br />Schroeder moved, Rowlettc seconded, to approve Application # 1988 for reconstruction <br />of the fence due to the hardships listed. Ayes 5, Nays 2, Peterson, Smith. Peterson said <br />be would have liked to have seen a lower fence with shrubs to be consistent with other <br />channel properties. Smith concurred. <br />(#7) #1989 WILLIAM STODDARD, 2805 KELLY AVENUE - CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:50-9:20 P,M. <br />The A£Sdavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />A letter from the Applicant to Orono officials was read to be added as part of the public <br />record. It was noted that permits had been received from the Minneha ha Creek <br />Watershed District and the Department of the Array/Corps of Engine^s for the <br />installation of the proposed pond. Stoddard had been in communication with the City <br />over street flooding matters and wrongly assumed he had satisfied City requirements. This <br />application is a land-use submission for a pond for water retention to aid with the flooding <br />that occurs in Kelly Avenue. <br />Mabusth said the property has a low area approximately 80‘x90’ in which the Applicant <br />would like to build a 60^60* pond. Landscaping would also involve the placement of <br />large rocks around the pond. The plan also includes the reseeding of all distrubed ams to <br />more suitable vegetation. The Applicant would also like to realign his driveway due to the <br />street flooding and is working with Public Works Director Gerfaardson on this matter. <br />The City Engineer recommended against large berm or rocks being placed in the <br />unimproved right-of-way. <br />Mabusth noted that this land is not a designated or protected wetland but a low retention <br />area. This project will not impact the «orm water plan and will have a minimal effect on <br />retention during flooding. <br />It was noted that the 550-600 yards of soil material being removed is now being <br />stockpiled but will be moved and trucked out by the contractor. <br />Berg reported having leceived complaints over the depth of the pond. It was clarified that <br />the pond will gradually deepen to approximately 6 ’ to 8'. It was noted that eight neighbors <br />have signed letters giving their approval of the pond as long as the pond conforms to <br />regulations stipulated by the MCWD, Corps of Engineers, and the City of Orono.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.