Laserfiche WebLink
1 ''m. ^ ^ •'•4-'> *#: K^:.t • • 0 if• « # * • <br />, • ^ <br />V <br />•icirv <br />ORONO’ <br />City of OROrVO <br />RCSOLUTKM Of THiCfTV COUNCIL <br />HO. 2311________ <br />A waaaumm ouurxk <br />A VMtlAACS TO <br />mncmii xo ibc cop e <br />8BCTX0N 10.23, f0»XVXSZ0a C CA) ft (B|rxu «uo4 <br />H <br />r <br />WBSBBAS, Gregg Perl, (hereinafter *the applicant”) ia the eener <br />of the property located at 309 Westlake Street within the City of Oreno <br />(hereinafter *City”) and legally described as follewst <br />Lots 1# 2, and 3 except the West 270* of said lots# Block 2# lillside <br />Park# Hennepin County# Minnesota (hereinafter *the preperty*)i and <br />VSBUMB# the applicant has applied to the City for a warianee to <br />Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23# Subdivision ft (A) to perait the <br />construction of a primary residential structure 3S* in defined height where <br />a defined height of only 30* is normally allowed# and a variance to Section <br />10.23# Subdivision ft (B) to allow a 12* side setback for that structure <br />where a 30* side setback is normally required# and to allow a 27.1* rear <br />setback where a 50* rear setback is normally required. <br />Minnesotat <br />MOW, T1 LBPOHB# BB XT RB80LVB0 by ^the.CityaCouncil of Orono# <br />f'iThe Jprop«rty ,,'is irlocatedxin ithey.LK'lA^ <br />Residential^Zoning District.*;#'V ‘' * m? <br />3. The Orono Planning Coaaiissien reviewed-this^;applieatic«ljen.«, <br />February 17# 1967 and Hovember 1ft# 1907# and recommended approval'*of‘ <br />the proposed variances based upon the following findings! <br />A) Approval of the variance for a side setback of 12*# finding <br />that the neighboring residence structure located at that side la <br />more than ftO* away# and this variance will not cause any <br />significant encroachment on light# air or open space in the <br />neighborhood. <br />B) Approval of a variance for rear setback of 27.1 feet finding <br />that the steep slopes behind the house makes it unlikely that a <br />house could feasibly be constructed on the property to the rear <br />and that that neighboring property to the rear is substandard in <br />size# does not have sewer available# and it is unlikely that a <br />house could feasibly be constructed on that property except near <br />Tonkawa Road# far from applicant's house. <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />/I. V