Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />-4K <br />TO:Chair Schroedcr and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM;Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE;January 11, 1995 <br />SfRIECT: #1975 Larry Anhalt, 2190 WayzaU Blvd. - Appeals - Continuation of Hearing <br />Addttkmal Exhibits <br />T - Gaffron ’s Sketch <br />U - 1989 Plat Map <br />V - 1994 Plat Map <br />W - Mn/'DOT Improvcmcitt Plan Dated 12/94 <br />X - Mn/DOT Construction Plan <br />The application was ubled at the October 1994 meeting of the Planning Con^ssion because <br />of the length of the agenda. The application was tabled at the November meeting at the request <br />of the City because of the complexity of issues to be addressed and we also lacked a quorum. <br />The appli^tion will be the first item to be addressed on this agenda. <br />The original October packets have been recopied for your convenience. There is only one new <br />issue that staff would like to address. That is the issue of the Impact of the proposed 1995 <br />Mn/DOT improvements of Highway 12 upon the property. The City has received severe* <br />conflicting exhibits that suggest various acquisitions of right-of-way by Mn/DOT. F^t the site <br />plan is inaccurate as it does not reflect the 10’ dedication of right-of-way at the time of the <br />Sugarwoods platting defined as a line drawn between A and B (Exhibit T). In reviewing the <br />current Mn/DOT improvement plans. Exhibits W and X. the right-of-way is shown per Lines <br />C and D. Compare Exhibits U and V. 1989 right-of-way line is completely different from the <br />one shown in the current plat map for 1994. Dennis Hill of the County advises Aat this will <br />more than likely be corrected as he has no proof in his files that such an acquisition has been <br />made in 1994 by Mn/DOT but Mr. Rebers should be able to provkte further cl^fication on this <br />matter. All documentation submitted with a formal application must include accurate <br />dimensions reflecting Mn/DOT’s adjusted right-of-way. <br />Review of Appeals Application <br />The first issue that must be addressed is the issue of the use and whether it is compatible or <br />permitted within the B-1 Zoning District. Staff, once again, strongly suggests that you visit the <br />site of the Pro Tire and Exhaust operation at 571 Tamarack Avenue in the Long Lake Industrial <br />Park. The proposed business use shows a retaU operation with show room and office areas with <br />a garage and car wash to rear (review Exhibit N). <br />Upon resolve of the matter of the compatibility/suitabUity of use then review other issues to be <br />addressed on pages 4 and 5 of the staff memo of October 13, 1994.