My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-2023 City Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2020-2024
>
2023
>
09-11-2023 City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2023 3:47:46 PM
Creation date
9/26/2023 3:47:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> September 11,2023 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> expansion. The rules are in place to protect the bluff and prevent bluff failure,she said.While the <br /> property is substandard in size and width,there is an existing deck and patio that allow for use and <br /> enjoyment of the lot. On Aug. 21 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and no public <br /> comments were made. The Commission noted the proposed project will bring the overall hardcover of the <br /> lot into compliance and remove several unpermitted improvements within the bluff and lake yard.The <br /> Commission thought the expansion was not unreasonable and voted 6 to 0 to approve the requested <br /> variances as applied. The applicant is present,she said. <br /> Benson asked about the amount of square footage that would be added to the deck. <br /> Nye said the issue is part of the house and the deck is in the bluff setback. She said in-kind replacement <br /> would be allowed. <br /> Allison Houston,4731 North Shore Drive,said one of the problems with the deck is that it is very small <br /> for the size of the home and can barely fit a table for four people. She said they were naïve about City <br /> regulations and this is the third or fourth plan trying to bring the plan closer to compliance. She said they <br /> would hope to use some of the existing pillars and add some new ones. The planning commission thought <br /> it would have minimal impact.They would be removing lakeside improvements. The topography is such <br /> there is no other place to put a deck and the lot is very steep. The deck sits on the main level of the home <br /> off the kitchen. The patio is below. <br /> Johnson asked about impact to the bluff to remove the improvements near the lake and the impact of <br /> bringing in equipment to do the work. <br /> The engineer said the bluff would be stabilized. <br /> Benson asked about any issues of bluff failure on this bluff area in the past. <br /> Edwards said the City had recently done a ravine stabilization project on the City right-of-way portion. <br /> He said the applicant's lot was not on the part of the bluff where there has been problems. <br /> Staff is recommending denial because the structure is in the bluff impact zone and they do have a deck to <br /> enjoy the property,Nye said. <br /> Crosby said the homeowners are doing some good things removing hardcover near the lake and he does <br /> see a practical difficulty because of the size of the deck and believes what the applicants are asking to do <br /> will not impact the bluff at all. He said he agrees with the Planning Commission. <br /> Benson said the situation is tricky and there are hardships,but she is not in favor of seeing the footprint in <br /> the bluff enlarged. <br /> Crosby moved to approve LA23-000042 4731 North Shore Drive—Variance as presented with the <br /> stipulation that the non-permitted structures near the lake be removed. <br /> Johnson amended the motion to allow expansion of the deck to the rear but to not disturb the bluff <br /> side of the deck. Crosby seconded the amended motion.VOTE: Ayes 3 Nays 1 (Benson). <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.