Laserfiche WebLink
HiaUTBS OP TBE PLM»IHG COMNISSIOH STIH6 HELD DBCENBKR 21, 1987 <br />•i “I§1201 BILBBLiaK/VOGT COHTIH1 <br />Applicants requested a variance tc the required 28* road <br />width to permit a 24' wide road. They noted that Golden <br />View Road is 24' in width which seemed excessively wide <br />and not necessary. <br />For safety and future planning reasons. Planning <br />Commission felt the 28* paved road width should be <br />maintained. <br />Cohen i Bellows felt revised drawings reflecting staff's <br />recommended changes should be submitted prior to making <br />a recommendation. <br />Johnson felt a recommendation with revisions to be made <br />prior to Council review could be made. <br />Mabusth noted that the only revision being requested is <br />realigning the road between Lot 6, Block 1 and Lot 2, <br />Block 2. Staff would like additional septic testing on <br />Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 7, Block 1, however, the testing <br />submitted is sufficient for preliminary approval. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision per <br />staff recommendation as outlined in memo and subject to <br />the following; <br />1. Realigning the road between Lot6, Block 1 and Lot <br />2, Block 2 to allow an adequate building envelope <br />for Lot 6, Block 1; <br />2. Additional septic testing done for Lot 1, Block <br />1 end Lot 7, Block 1 as deemed necessary by M. <br />Gaffron. <br />Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. Cohen and Bellows voted nay <br />finding the realignment of the road a material change <br />that should be reviewed prior to approval. Motion <br />carried.