Laserfiche WebLink
MINDTBS OP THE PIAMHIHG 0 SSI TIEG HELD OCTOBER 19, 1987 <br />#643 BROCB 6 CAMILLE CURTISS <br />1920 PA6BRHESS POIET ROAD <br />RBCOMSIDBRATIOH OP VARIANCE APPLICATION <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the location of <br />the fence and property stakes, noting that approximately <br />3-1/2 sections of fence are located out in the road <br />right-of-way and about 3 sections of ^ence are located <br />within 75' of lake. Mabusth noted a petition submitted <br />by applicants signed by neighbors approving the fence; <br />a letter from Camille Curtiss explaining the hardship; <br />and a letter from David and Vicki Slavik, 1913 Fagerness <br />Point Road stating they have no objection to the fence. <br />Bruce and Camille Curtiss were present for this matter. <br />Bellows stated that at first review there was a very <br />clear direction to install a turnaround, that was <br />ignored, and a fence installed subsequently, and felt <br />hardpressed that this should be continued and <br />reconsidered. She felt there was no unique hardship to <br />allow the 6' fence and recommended the installation of <br />the turnoaround for safety. <br />Chairman Kelley agreed with Bellows and recommended a 3- <br />1/2' fence along the entire lot line even if it <br />encroaches into the 0-75' area. <br />Camille Curtiss stated that they need a fence for safety <br />for her children, and because the area next to the road <br />is the only area for family functions, they would <br />appreciate a 6' high fence for privacy. Regarding the <br />turnaround, she stated that it was a misunderstanding <br />that it was required and have no objections to <br />installing the turnaround. <br />Cohen also felt that only a 3-1/2' fence should be <br />allowed. <br />Vicki Slavik, 1913 Fagerness Point Road, stated that <br />Fagerness Point Road is a very dangerous road for <br />children and therefore agrees with the need for a 6' <br />fence for safety. <br />Chairman Kelley recommended the use of plantings for <br />additional screening with a 3-1/2' fence. <br />Bruce Curtiss stated that he felt issues have been lost <br />since the review years ago. He stated that the fence <br />was brought up in that review but no mention is made of <br />it in the minutes. He stated that he checked with <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth when he started to <br />construct the fence and was told that the fence was not <br />a problem. Now, a year later, the fence is a problem.