My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-21-1987 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
09-21-1987 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2023 12:14:06 PM
Creation date
9/21/2023 9:36:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIMUTBS OP THE PLIUnilllG COHHISSION TING HELD SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 <br />• 1201 HILBBLIIIKAOGT CONTIHUED <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the revised <br />proposal per the Planning Commission directives from the <br />September 8, 1987 sketch plan review meeting. All lots <br />are now served by interior plat roads and all lots meet <br />the required lot width at the rear of the required front <br />yard setback line, but Lot 8 is optional. She reviewed <br />the outlets for future development not to be constructed <br />at this time, only as a potential through road if the <br />City deems necessary. <br />In response to Chairman Kelley's question. Zoning <br />Administrator Mabusth stated that criteria considered by <br />the City which may necessitate the through road would be <br />changes in density resulting from sewer. She noted that <br />the City is not intent on taking over roads serving <br />areas at 2+ acre densities, which they would have to do <br />if a through road was put in. <br />Phil Nelson explained the contours and soils of the <br />property noting that septic testing has not yet been <br />completed, however, mound systems are anticipated for <br />all lots. <br />Bill Hull, 2445 Woodhaven Drive, stated his main concern <br />is the traffic and safety with many small children in <br />their area if a through road were constructed. He <br />stated he has no objection with the plan as currently <br />proposed. <br />Allen Engleman, 316 Old Crystal Bay Road, voiced concern <br />with damage to the road and bridge from heavy truck <br />traffic from the existing and future develpment. He <br />stated that these trucks are over the posted weight <br />limit asking what the City intends to do about it. <br />Mr. Fngleman was advised to submit photos that he has <br />taken of such violators for appropriate staff person to <br />enforce. <br />Scott Goldsmith, 265 Old Crystal Bay Road, asked about <br />the drainage from the proposed develepment; and will a <br />nine lot plat create a need for a storm sewer. <br />Phil Nelson stated that approximately 96% of the <br />drainage will go to the drainage swale by the railroad <br />tracks. He explained the drainage pattern which is not <br />anticipated to change by the proposed development. <br />Chairman Kelley asked if a berm along Old Crystal Bay <br />Road was planned.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.