Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTBS OF THE PIAHIilHG O USSION MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 21, 1987 <br />§1200 SCHERBER COHTIIIUBD <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />Hanson asked if applicant would be content with only a <br />6' wide deck which, to Hanson, seemed fairly unuseable. <br />Mr. Scherber stated the proposed size was adequate. <br />Bellows noted that the Planning Commission did not have <br />to approve construction of a deck merely because <br />"somebody" installed a sliding door. She noted the <br />option of a New Orleans balcony which is essentially a <br />protective rail for the sliding doors. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, to <br />recofumend approval as proposed per staff recommendation, <br />and subject to removal of the concrete slab prior to <br />final inspection of the deck. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />#1202 PAUL SCHUELLEP. <br />1280 SPRUCE PLACE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:24-7:30 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Paul and Susan Schueller were present for this matter. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the request for a <br />front setback variance and hardcover variance to <br />construct a 24'x 40* detached garage 3* from the side <br />lot line and increasing the 75-250* hardcover by 1,291 <br />s.f. Applicant currently has no garage and needs <br />storage area. The existing sewer line prohibit an <br />alternative location in addition to the 50* wide lot <br />which prevents access to the garage doors from the side. <br />Chairman Kelley felt there was a definite need for a <br />garage but the proposed size of garage was not <br />appropriate for this lot. <br />Bellows agreed that the proposed size of garage was <br />inappropriate for the neighborhood. <br />Brown agreed with Kelley and Bellows. <br />Mr. Schueller stated he had many items to be stored <br />including a boat. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that applicant have <br />tried, unsuccessfully, to acquire additional property.