Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OP THE PIAHHIliq COHHISSIOH :i:^:TING HELD JOLT 20, 1987 <br />II11167 BACnCBS CONTINl <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />recommend renewal of the variances per staff <br />recommendation. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 0. (Taylor not <br />present to vote. ) <br />#1168 RICHARD G. HBLSTRQM <br />2895 CASCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:34-8:51 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Chairman Kelley read into the record a letter received <br />this day from J.K. Bowers, 2905 Casco Point Road, asking <br />the Planning Commission to consider his property <br />in relation to the average lakeshore setback proposed by <br />applicant, so that he is not deprived of lake views and <br />lake breeze. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />request for hardcover and average lakeshore setback <br />variances to construct a 2nd story three-season porch <br />and deck as follows: <br />-Hardcover 75-250' - Existing * 45.3% <br />- Proposed « 45.7% <br />-Average Lakeshore Setback Encroachment <br />- Existing * 0* <br />- Proposed = 25' <br />Applicant proposes to construct a 2nd story three-season <br />porch and deck where only a ground-level loose concrete <br />block patio now exists. The three-seascn porch is <br />approximately 16'x 20' surrounded on two sides by a 9' <br />deck. <br />Bellows felt that, based on the drawings submitted, it <br />should be considered an "addition" to the house, not an <br />average opaque porch structure. <br />Richard Helstrom was present for this matter and stated <br />he did not feel the addition would obstruct Mr. Bowers' <br />view, and there would be a minimal view obstruction, if <br />any, from Elson's (2879 Casco Point Rd.) yard. He noted <br />that the addition would be 110' from the lakeshore. <br />Dick Kail, 2915 Casco Point Rd., stated applicant's <br />house is downhill from his, therefore, the addition <br />would not obstruct his view. <br />8