Laserfiche WebLink
MiaOTBS OP THE PLAimiHG COMMISSIOH lO^lHG HELD JDLf 20* 1987 <br />«1169 HEAR PARTH]LSHIP BHT. COHTIHOBD <br />Chairman Kelley recommended that the wetland issue be <br />resolved by DNR, staff and applicant before Planning <br />Commission action. <br />Phil Nelson reviewed the proposed preliminary plat, cul- <br />de-sac and Outlet A. <br />Planning Commission unanimously agreed that they found <br />no problem with the preliminary subdivision as proposed <br />contingent upon the wetland issue being resolved and the <br />platting of 2 acre minimum lots. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to <br />table this matter pending resolve of the wetland issue. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#1171 LAHDMARK CONSTRUCTION INC. <br />3820 & 3830 BATSIDB ROAD <br />CLASS III SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:45-7:59 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth reviewed the application <br />which applicant is in the process of purchasing the <br />beach house property (Lot 3) and the farm house property <br />(combined Lots 1 and 2) from Mrs. Miner. Applicant <br />proposes a subdivision or platting to create one new <br />building site. She explained staff's recommendation for <br />alternatives regarding access. <br />Paul Swanson, President of Landmark Construction, was <br />present for this matter and explained his proposal, <br />specifically his plan for an access road. He noted that <br />he would like the riparian lot to serve all three lots <br />and noted that LMCD allows one boat per 50 feet of <br />lakeshore. He stated that if the lagoon is included, <br />there is approximatley 300' of lakeshore. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that he would need <br />at least 200' of lakeshore to satisfy riparian uses for <br />one residential lot. <br />Chairman Kelley stated they need more information <br />regarding: <br />-definition of wetlands, location on property <br />-definition of dry buildable for Lots 1, 2 & 3 <br />In addition, he felt only Lot 3 should have riparian <br />rights. <br />Paul Swanson stated that the LMCD told him he could have <br />three docks on the riparian lot.