Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTES OF THE PIAIOilEG COMMISSIOH IKE¥lllG HELD JOLT 20, 1987 <br />#1176 POTMAN CONTINUED <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to <br />recommend denial of the proposal based on insufficent <br />facts regarding average lakeshore setback. Motion, Ayes <br />4, Mays 1. Johnson voted nay. <br />#1176 MICHAEL PLANK <br />4145 HATERTOWM ROAD <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEN <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />sketch plan to divide off second dwelling from main <br />house that is being required as a condition of <br />Resolution #2122. Applicant has been allowed to use the <br />easterly access pending this subdivision request. <br />Applicant is submitting two preliminary proposals review <br />for : <br />1) Conceptual review of the proposed driveway access <br />corridor; and <br />2) Conceptual review of the proposed lot line <br />revision with the applicants westerly property. Ths <br />boundary change is intended to give applicant more <br />land in the easterly parcel by dropping the westerly <br />parcel to the minimum of 5.0 acres dry buildable. <br />Applicant prefers Proposal I, leaving 5.0 dry acres <br />in Lots 1 and 2 and 14.4 total acres in Lot 3, a <br />flag lot with a 30' access corridor to serve that <br />house over the driveway than is in place (access <br />point to be moved so it is within the 30' corridor). <br />Staff has no problem with this access location on <br />Watertown Road from a safety standpoint. Proposal <br />II is essentially the same but leaves a 50' access <br />corridor. Staff prefers Proposal II. The wetland in <br />the westerly parcel (Lot 1) has what staff would <br />call an "indefinite" boundary. <br />Chairman Kelley felt it important to define the wetland <br />prior to any approval. <br />Mr. & Mrs. Michael Plank were present for this matter. <br />Michael Plank stated that after the wetland is defined, <br />Lo- 2 will be adjusted to meet the minimum of 5.0 acres <br />dry buildable. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that the <br />adjacent neighbor, Joe Sawchuk, 4105 Watertown Road, has <br />concerns with the access b». cause it is so close to his <br />house. <br />Mrs. Plank stated that it is their intention to heavily <br />screen the access from the Sawchuk property to protect <br />the privacy for both property owners.