Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTBS OP TEB PLAHHIBG O • :':i SSim MBBTING mOiD OWm 15, 1987 <br />11155/11156 DBAPBR COIITIW <br />John Bluxnentritt stated these lots have always been <br />intended as two building lots noting the two paid sewer <br />and water units. He noted the that the proposed <br />footprint design of houses meet all the required <br />setbacks and did not feel that these structures would be <br />an offensive addition to the neighborhood. Because of <br />awkward shapes of the two lots combined, it would be <br />difficult to make one site flow into another site as a <br />well organized building site. <br />Mr, Slavik noted that the properties have not been <br />maintained by the owner for many years. <br />Mr. Blumentritt stated that they recognize that there <br />have been problems and hope to correct the situation. <br />Denny Williams, 1932 Eagerness Point Road, asked if <br />these lots had any lakeshore rights? <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron stated that the <br />City does not recognize any lakeshore rights that these <br />lots would have. <br />Mr. Draper stated that there is a 6* easement on the <br />certificate of title for both of the lots across the <br />Fagerness Point on part of Lot 27, which allows him to <br />have a dock. <br />There were no other comments from the public and the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />Johnson asked applicant what prevented him from building <br />in 1971? <br />Mr. Draper stated that the builder died of a heart <br />attack. <br />Bellows felt that the lots were too substandard noting <br />the hardcover shown does not include any decks, garages, <br />driveway, etc. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Bellows, <br />recommended denial of the lot area variances in <br />Applications #1155 & #1156. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 2. <br />Cohen voted nay stating he agreed that the configuration <br />of the two lots combined precludes a building sJte. <br />Brown voted nay noting that as long as the house meets <br />the setbacks and hardcover limit it is acceptable and <br />noted the issue of long time ownership. <br />I