Laserfiche WebLink
I MIHOTBS of the PLANMIHG COMMISSION TING HELD JUNE 15, 1987 <br />1958 VOTAGEOB SERVICE CENTER CONTINUED <br />Planning Commission expressed concern with interference <br />of the canopy in the designated fire lane, and that the <br />fire inspector should determine if this would a <br />problem. <br />Mr. O’Sullivan noted that their hours of operation will <br />be from 6 AM to Midnight; the drainage will not be <br />changed; and they plan to install all new gas tanks and <br />lines. <br />2oning Administrator Mabusth noted that staff no longer <br />feels there will be a stacking problem with the car wash <br />operation. <br />Planning Commission unanimously agreed that the code did <br />not have to be amended for this multi-use proposal. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Hanson, to recommend <br />approval of the variances and commercial site plan <br />finding no problem with the proposed parking plan and <br />subject to approval by the fire inspector. Motion, Ayes <br />5, Nays 1. Bellows voted nay stating it was too intense <br />use for the size of the property specifically the <br />convenience store and number of gas pumps. <br />#1143 DONALD HILDMAN <br />745 SPRING HILL ROAD <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 9:25-9:37 <br />Mr. & Mrs. Donald Wildman were present for this matter. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained the <br />request to construct a 4-car garage and caretaker <br />apartment above, replacing the existing 3-car garage to <br />be removed. A conditional use permit is required for a <br />detached combination guest house and garage, and <br />floor area variance required for accessory structure. <br />The proposed structure meets the setback requirements. <br />The principal residence has been recently remodeled and <br />this new garage/rpartment is designed to architecturally <br />complement the house. It was noted that the lot area of <br />approximately 24 acres is such that the structure could <br />be divided off with a 2-acre parcel, although that is <br />not the applicant's intent. <br />In response to the questioned hardship, Mr. Wildman <br />stated that the existing "shed" contains no storage and <br />their sizeable home and property should have an <br />acommodating garage. <br />. i