Laserfiche WebLink
MIHUTBS OP THE PLMffilHG COnUSSIOH MEETIH6 BBIJ) APRIL 20, 1987 <br />#1103 BISBHGKR COHTIRI <br />Hanson stated that after considerable thought, he felt <br />that he finds no harm to allowing 80,000 - 200,000 cubic <br />yards of fill. Although it may be an acceptable use at <br />this point in time, he felt that the City is not capable <br />of planning such a project on such a long term use. <br />Johnson felt that based on the five agencies <br />recommendations in addition to the City Engineers <br />recommendation, 80,000 to 100,000 cubic feet of fill was <br />acceptable therefore should be allowed with a progress <br />review after one year prior to anymore fill being <br />allowed. He also noted the City Engineer's concerns <br />that too much fill on the site might force organic <br />materials to move out. <br />Planning Commission agreed with Johnson's compromising <br />approach . <br />It was moved by Johnson, seconded by Taylor, to <br />recommend approval of the conditional use permit for <br />80,000 - 100,000 cubic yards of fill subject to staff's <br />recommendations and: <br />a) review of the project in one year for <br />consideration of additional fill <br />b) specific cleanup mcjasures taken <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. (Cohen was not present for this <br />review.) <br />#1109 CURTIS L. JOmiSOR <br />2024 SHADTNOOD ROAD <br />VARIARCBS <br />CORTimiATIOH OF PUBLIC HEARING 8:07-8:20 <br />Curtis L. Johnson and Pam Willette were present for this <br />matter. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron briefly reviewed <br />the request for lot area/lot width, hardcover, side <br />setback, and average lakeshore setback variances to a) <br />lift house; b) put a new foundation under it, certer it <br />on the lot, but further lakeward to coincide with <br />neighboring houses; c) put a second story on it, parts <br />of which would be in side yard setback. <br />Planning Commission unanimously agreed that the only <br />variance of concern was the average lakeshore setback. <br />Pam Willette noted that the neighbors have no objection <br />to their proposal. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed.