My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
09-18-2023 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2023 8:48:37 AM
Creation date
9/19/2023 8:18:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LA23-000046 <br />September 18, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Hardcover Variance (Section 78-1700 and 78-1680) <br />The property is approximately 0.1 acres in a 2.0 -acre zoning district. The maximum allowable <br />hardcover is 1,122 square feet. The property received a hardcover variance in 2005 in order to <br />construct the home, driveway and walkway. The current property is at approximately 27.63% <br />hardcover when 25% is the maximum. The resolution approving the 2005 variance explicitly <br />stated that the homeowner was foregoing a deck in order to minimize the hardcover request <br />and that further hardcover expansion would not be supported. The proposed deck expansion <br />increases hardcover by approximate 334 square feet (deck, stairs, and landing) brining the <br />percentage of hardcover up to 35% for the lot. <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. §216C.06, <br />subd. 14, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />According to MN §462.357 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed variance is not in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed <br />deck is within the 75 -foot lake setback and creates a new encroachment into the <br />average lakeshore setback. The increase in hardcover is also not supported by the <br />Ordinance. This criterion is not met. <br />The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variance is not <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan emphasizes the <br />protection of natural resources including our natural waterways. The proposal creates <br />new encroachments in the 75 -foot lake setback and increases hardcover. This criterion <br />is not met. <br />The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The construction of a new deck is not <br />supported by practical difficulties and therefore is not a reasonable use of the <br />property. This criterion is not met. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The lot size and width have not been created by the current homeowner. <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variance in <br />order to construct a new deck would not likely impact the character of the area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.