10-17-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MIHDTBS OP THE PIAHNING CQMIIISSIOH MBBTI1IG OCTOBER 17, 1988 ZOHIEG FILE il346-HAGBERG CONTIN1 increase. U » Chairman Kelley commented that he would not object to the hardcover increasing in the 250-500' zone, but he did not agree with the proposed increase for the 75-25C zone. Kelley asked if there would be any hardcover Mr. Hagberg could remove to keep the hardcover the same? Gaffron replied that there was plastic underlying some rockbeds that Mr. Hagberg could remove. Kelley asked about the road to the back cx Mr. Hagberg's property. Mr. Hagberg explained that it was a City access for the sewer lines. Kelley asked what the hardcover in the 75-250* would be if the road was removed from the calculations. Gaffron replied that the road was 900 s.f. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of #1346, the hardship being the City access road. Motion, Ayes*5, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1347 MICHAEL HALLEY HOMES, INC. 2715 PENCE LANE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARI^ 11:35 P.M. - 11:55 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Robert Martinson was present as a representative of Michael Halley Homes, Inc., and Mr. and Mrs. Dean Terry, the property owners were also present. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicants were proposing to construct a gateway system at the entrance of the driveway serving 2710 and 2715 Pence Lane, about 150* in from Kelley Avenue. The existing wooden planters will be removed. Planning Commission member Brown asked why this structure needed variance approval. Kelley replied that the 4* height did not conform to the 3-1/2' maximum set forth in the ordinance. reminded the Planning Commission that if the structure were placed 30' back from the property line and at least 10' from the side property line, a setback variance would not be necessary. Gaffron pointed out the fact that the proposed structure would encroach on a 10* drainage and utility easement. If this application is approved, the City will require a Hold Harmless Agreement so that the City or any other utility company can make repairs to their utility lines and not ba held responsible for any damage that might be done to the wall. Gaffron expressed the concerns of the neighboring property