10-03-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MIHUTES OP THB PIAimillG COMMISSION MEETING OCTOWSk 3, 1988 ZONING FILE il340-flASHINGTON SCIENTIFIC CUP>CONTINUEC to be treated. Kelley asked how difficult it w.-suld bo to haul all of the soil off of the property and bring in clean soil? Mr. Ronnei stated that it would be very difficult to proceed witn such a project. The soil would have to be incinera ed. Once the soil is incinerated, disposal would still be required. The chemical that is being used to clean the soil is" similar to rubbing alcohol and will volotize as soon as it is exposed to the air. Kelley asked how the City felt about this process. Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that tne City had no problem with the proposed process. She had been in contact with the PCA's Hazardous Material Division and Air Quality Division and they will be working on that phase of the application. They in turn will work with the City of Orono. Mabusth stated that she was still awaiting more information from the City Engineer concerning phase two. Mabusth recommended tabling that portion of the project. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commission member Brown, seconded by Planning Commission member Moos, to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for land alteration. Motion, Ayes^e, Nayss»0, Motion passed. #1341 DANIEL R. VAUGHAN & TODD ZIBSMER 3440 BAT8IDE ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 9:46 P.M. - 9:50 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. Todd Ziesmer was present for this matter. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that the applicants were seeking a lot width variance to construct a new residence. The property area is approximately 2.3 acres. There was a pre-existing house that was demolished. Applicants are proposing to locate the new house where the old structure stood. The existing lot width is 118' where 200' is required, so applicants would require an 82' variance. Chairman Kelley asked whether there was an adequate building envelope. Gaffron replied that it would leave the required 30' side setbacks. Mr. Robert Anderson, a neighbor to the east of applicants' property, stated that he had concern about the house interfering with his view of Stubbs Bay. He had contacted Mr. Ziesmer and discussed this concern. Mr. Ziesmer had indicated that he may be willing to move the house back 15'. Kelley asked if a lakeshore setback would be a concern. Gaffron responded that this property