My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-03-1988 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1988
>
10-03-1988 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 8:44:17 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 4:13:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MimiTBS OF THE PIAilNIHG COMMISSION TING OCTOBER 3, 1988 <br />ZONING PILE «1336-OBERHAOSSR CONTINI <br />were in favor of having only one structure on the lot. <br />There were no coininents from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commission member Johnson, to table application #1336. Motion, <br />Ayes»6, Mays«0, Motion passed. <br />#1337 ROBERT PAIGE <br />3493 CRYSTAL PLACE <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:45 P.M. ~ 8:52 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicant was present for this matter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />explained that the property in question was located at the corner <br />of Crystal Place and Navarre Avenue. Mr. Paige is seeking a <br />setback variance to construct a detached garage in his front <br />yard. The garage v.*o;ld be located 5* from the street lot line of <br />Crystal Place and AC from the street lot line of Navarre Avenue. <br />Chairman Kelley asked about the designation of the front of the <br />house. Gaffron stated that because the applicant was using <br />Crystal Place as his address, that side of the house would be <br />considered the front. Gaffron stated that there is a question as <br />to whether the codes require the detached garage to be located <br />behind the existing front line of the house parallel to the side <br />street. <br />Chairman Kelley asked whether there were any neighbors who <br />were present to express their opinions of this application. <br />There were none. Kelley asked Gaffron if any correspondence had <br />been received from neighboring properties. Gaffrcn stated he had <br />not received any comments from Mr. Paige's neighbors. Mr. Paige <br />stated that he felt embarrassed about proposing such a plan if <br />30' setback was required. He was not aware of that fact. He <br />stated that had he known that, he would not have made such a <br />proposal. Mr. Paige stated that he was "stymied". Chairman <br />Kelley asked Mr. Paige if he would like to come back with a <br />revised plan. Mr. Paige stated that he could not afford another <br />$150.00 fee. Kelley told him it would not be necessary to pay <br />any additional fees. Mr. Paige said he would like some advice as <br />to where a feasible location for the garage would be. <br />Planning Commission member Hanson suggested building the new <br />garage in the location of the old garage. Mr. Paige stated that <br />he could not afford to build in that location because of the <br />excavation required. Planning Commission member Brown stated <br />that he did not see where there would be a need for a great
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.