09-19-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

NIVOTBS OF THB PLAmililG C v:i:i SSIC» HBBTISG SEPTBTOR 19« 1988 •I -*ZOHIliG FILED #1301-MHITB COETIE the City could regulate development of the outlot. Planning Commission member Cohen expressed his preference for "Option A" of staff's recommendations as opposed to "Option B". Kelley asked Mr. White what his preference would be. Mr. White indicated that he had no objection to the terms set forth in •Option A", making the large lot an outlot. It was moved by Planning Commission member Cohenr to recommend approval of this application# per staff's recommendations and conditions of approval which included the terms of "Option A" rather than "Option B". Upon further review of staff's recommendations and conditions# Cohen questioned paragraph 2 concerning a 17' right-of-way for County Road 19. Cohen withdrew his motion until this was clarified. Gaffron explained this would allow a consistency with the City's 100' right-of-way corridor for the McCully Road connection between County Roads 19 and 6. Bellows asked how the right-of-way would affect the applicant's dry buildable. Gaffron stated that it might have an effect. Kelley asked about setbacks and septic tanks. Gaffron stated that the 17' right-of-way would still allow for the required 50' setback for the existing house. There should be no interference with the septic tanks located on the property. Kelley asked if the northerly lot line could be moved enough to offset the 17' right-of-way should it create a deficit in the required dry buildable? Gaffron answered affirmatively. Gaffron clarified for Mr. White what the City would need to do in light of the 17' right-of-way. Applicant questioned how that would affect the 150’ corridor and the possibility of turning that into a lot in the future. It was his understanding that 150' was the maximum. Gaffron replied that there was actually a 200' standard for the District# and noted that the width of that corridor necessarily decreases as the 2 acre requirements for Lot 1 is satisfied. There would be no other alternatives if applicant wished to obtain the 2-acre dry buildable requirement where the house is now located. Bellows added that the wetland does not extend to the property line so there would be no way to make it contiguous going the other way. Cohen asked why the City was considering the County's request for the 17'. Gaffron stated that normally the City denies any right- of-way requests for County roads that are not heavily travelled. Due to the fact that the City has a 100' corridor to the north# and because the road is a major connecting point for Highway 12 and Mound# the City Staff felt it would be appropriate to grant the right-of-way. It was moved by Cohen# seconded by Bellows# to recommend approval of application #1301# per staff recommendations and conditions. The Planning Commission recommended "Option A" because it would be a planning mode since future development in that area has not yet been determined. Paragraph 6 would be omitted entirely at this time. This approval would also be based nssp