09-19-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

imniTBS OF TBB PLMmiHG comssictt j H:mtm ssmiOm it, itis Z0HIV6 PILE «1334-BEBERS COETIMUBD opportunity available through the current PRD. This would allow reasonable conditions to be attached to the approval. There is a rezoning issue with the PUD. This would mean that the applicants would not come back before the Planning Commission with the new PUD classification. The property has been rezoned R-lA, and the subdivision will be approved through the PRD/Conditional Use Permit. This matter would not come back for a final development plan approval of the PUD, because the applicant did not apply for that. Zoning Administrator Mabusth advised the Planning Commission to table this matter uaL5 "• chey can develop further conditions, because this would be the last review of the preliminary subdivision and conditional use permit. Bellows requested an opportunity to meet with the City staff that is more familiar with the conditional use permit process so that proper definitions can be made. Nr. Jarvis asked Chairman Kelley if they could proceed to the City Council with the rezoning portion of the proposal. Jarvis also stated that he would like notice of the conditions in advance of the City Council meeting so they can be prepared. Kelley suggested giving some conception of the Planning Commission's opinion of the PRD. Planning Commission member Johnson stated that he would be in favor of the PRD, providing the aspect of a private trail system versus a public trail system was addressed. He would like to see the land given back to the Community since the trail system is a trade-off for the lack of 2-acre lot sizes. Chairman Kelley doubted there would be much that could be done in that capacity since the land was private land. Bellows asked about the aspect of park dedication? Bellows also stated that she would not be in favor of the PRD as it stands. She would only approve it if there was an alternative to the cul-de-sac and she did not feel that this was a PRD. Kelley was not fully opposed to the idea of the PRD or the cul- de-sac. The issue of the island will need to be addressed. Planning Commission member Hanson indicated that he was at a 60%/40% status in favor of the plan. It was determined that the conditions and directions from the Planning Commission would be discussed during the October 3rd Planning Commission Meeting. It was suggested that the applicants have a representative present at that meeting. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. f It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by , to table #1334, until the October 17, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion, Ayes»5, Nays«0, Motion passed.