Laserfiche WebLink
MIHDTB8 OP THE PLMnilEG COMUSSIOH !TIE6 illU> J1 20, 190S <br />91296 mmiTT J. PBTIItSOR 6 MCE STODOLE <br />1095 SHEDmOOD BOED <br />VEEIEECB <br />POBLIC HBEBIE6 0sl2-0tl9 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Merritt Peterson and Rick Stodola were present for this <br />matter. <br />Vhe application involves a lot area variance to <br />determine buildability and if not, what reasonable use <br />can be made of the property. Applicants constructed a <br />dock without the required building permit on this <br />property where no principal structure exists. <br />Mabusth explained that clearly Tracts P & G are not <br />buildable. Applicants are therefore asking if the dock <br />can remain as a reasonable use for this unbuildable <br />property. <br />Mabusth explained the history of the entire area of <br />properties. She noted that a combination of the total <br />seven lots may provide a buildable lot, but the <br />encroachment of the Tillotson house on Lot 0003 creates <br />problems. She noted that the Tillotson dock is located <br />on the same lot as applicants illegally constructed <br />dock. Tract F. <br />Mr. Peterson noted that Mr. Tillotson owns 30* more than <br />shown on the survey. <br />Mabusth stated that such a division of the property has <br />been done without the City's knowledge or required <br />approval. <br />Kelley suggested making a recommendation on this <br />application irrespective of the status of Lot 0003. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Kelley, to deny the <br />buildability of Tracts F & G; and recommend denial to <br />allow the dock to remain due to the fact that no <br />principal structure exists on the property. Motion, <br />Ayes 7, Mays 0.