Laserfiche WebLink
NIBQTBS of THB PIAHHIBG COMMISSIOII MBBTIRG RKLD JMUAST 27, 1988 <br />11239 WILLIAMS COHTIWinEDCohen agreed with the Howmeyers and felt that the <br />application should be tabled to give the other property <br />owners the opportunity to coninent on this critical <br />issue. <br />Bellows stated she did not like granting lot area and <br />lot width variances without a building envelope. <br />Mabusth suggested that Public Works Director Gerhardson <br />also attend the meeting to discuss the road improvement <br />issue. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />table this matter so that the affected property owners <br />are advised about the road improvement issue and given <br />the opportunity to comment. Motion, Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />8.11 >*1240 MAVAKKB DAIRY <br />3574 SBORBLin DRIVB <br />COKBIBRCIAL SITS PLAM RBVIBH <br />4 VARIAMCB <br />PUBLIC HBARIMG 7:56-8*09The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Hailing <br />were noted. <br />Owner/Applicant, Rick Plaisted, was present for this <br />matter. <br />Jacobs explained that the original proposal included a <br />7'xlO' solarium addition to the south side, but has <br />since been omitted because of the inability to conform <br />with the restroom reguirements. The proposal now <br />consists of only a drive-through/pick up station on the <br />west side. <br />Bellows felt it was inappropriate to review and make a <br />recommendation on this application without a landscaping <br />plan. <br />Jacobs noted that there have been several changes in the <br />plan and he has been in contact with the contractor by <br />phone from South Dakota, which has made it difficult to <br />solve some of the issues. <br />Cohen and Bellows felt that the application should be <br />tabled for staff to review the application without the <br />solarium addition (parking requirements, etc.) and <br />pending a landscape plan.