My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO:Chair Lindquist and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorsc, City Administrator <br />FROM:Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE:October 4,1996 <br />SUBJECT: #2178 Nathalie Gray and Robert and Lorraine E. Roden, 460/480 Orchard Park <br />Road - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Zoning District: RR-IA <br />Application: Applicants have filed a subdivision of a lot line rearrangement seeking the City's <br />approval of a transfer of land between owners originally deeded in November, 1971. The following <br />ordinances are pertinent for this review: <br />1. Section 11.03 Definition 66(Al-3) - Subdivision may be completed as Class I division. <br />2. Section 11.10, Subdivision 10(A) - Class I subdivision requirements. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Owner ’s List <br />D - Chicago Title Insurance Company Letter 9/6/85 <br />E - Staff Letter 9/27/96 <br />F - 1971 Warranty Deed <br />G - Current Mortgage Reflecting Legal Description for 480 Orchard Park Road <br />H - Subdivision of a Lot Line Rearrangement <br />Review of Application <br />Applicants have filed the subdivision application with the City in order to complete the process <br />begun back in November, 1971. The subdivision code of 1971 would have required the filing of the <br />subdivision application. The City obviously denied the division in 1971 and advised the County of <br />the need for subdivision approval by City. Real estate ta.xes have never been adjusted to reflect the <br />transfer of property nor does the Hennepin County plat maps reflect the division, refer to Exhibit B. <br />The properties are located in the 5 acre minimum lot zone. Parcel A consists of 15,045 s.f. with the <br />addition of the 15’ corridor the lot area is adjusted to 17,700 s.f. Parcel B at 4.44 acres is reduced <br />to 4.38 acres. Review Exhibit B, note owner of Parcel B owns several contiguous parcels. <br />Applicants should be encouraged to consider a future division that would provide Parcel A with <br />additional area for septic upgrade. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.