My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16,1996 <br />(#4 - #2159 James and Joann Jundt - Continued) <br />McMillan asked if there would be changes to the vegetation. Jundt said the plans call for <br />trimming only. <br />Gafiron said the code normally asks for a staircase to come straight down in order to keep <br />the hardcover to a minimum. The stairs now angle down across the slope and are partially <br />hidden by vegetation <br />Smith noted that the number of staircases was previously review ed It was determined <br />that if the property was broken dow n into parcels that the number of stairw ays would be <br />acceptd^le. <br />Hawn commented on the uniqueness of the property and the fact that only restoration w as <br />being performed, not new improvements Hawn said she spoke with the gardener who <br />said he used the far stairways alot in his work and the restoration would increase the <br />safety Hawn said she had no problem with the restoration <br />Jundt said it was their intent to return the property to what it once was and not change it. <br />She said she had questioned whether the boathouse should be restored and was informed <br />that it should be as it has historically value She inlbrmed Mabusth when questioned that <br />additional damage could occur if the repair was not made Mabusth said, although the <br />cost of repair may exceed 50% of value, she would be inclined to allow the repair because <br />of the uniqueness. <br />Stoddard asked how the valuation was determined. Gaffron said the assessor's value was <br />usually taken from 1975 records However, no value was established for this building in <br />the records A value for a comparable building of its size could possibly be used. <br />Lindquist asked whether the Commission was including the boathouse or not in this <br />application. Mabusth said there was a need to allow the structural repair to the roof, but <br />the applicant would have to come back with more information on the foundation. <br />Lindquist said he would need more information before he could vote on the issue and <br />asked for an estimate Mrs Jundt said she thought it would be okay to repair the <br />structure. Gaffron said it was a matter or defining whether and to what extent structural <br />repair actually is needed Gaffron said he would want the building inspector to look at the <br />structure if the boathouse was included in the application Lindquist said the Commission <br />would only look at the sidewalk, retaining walls, and grotto, and would not include the <br />boathouse in this approval. <br />There were no public comments.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.