My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 <br />(^2 - Zoning Amendment - Continued) <br />Hawn noted that there was no particular danger lea\ing the zoning as it currently stands in <br />that the issue of drive-thru restaurants was a conditional use and w ould require rev iew, <br />while tobacco shops w ere a permitted use She noted that the oflf-street parking relates to <br />all of the zones <br />Callahan responded that the off-street parking for the most part required a business to be <br />on the property He said he did not understand the need for the permitted use. citing off- <br />premise parking being permitted at the Art Center for the nearby marina Gaffron said all <br />of the parking code sections would be reviewed. <br />Lindquist asked Gaffron to review the B-6 Gaffron indicated the B-b revision would <br />affect one item only The B-6 includes office, banks, libraries, motels, and Class 1 <br />restaurants (sit-down type) All drive-thru type uses are conditional uses. The committee <br />suggested that a drive-thru bank would be acceptable but a drive-thru restaurant would <br />lend itself to more options including fast food. The Committee suggested drive-thru <br />restaurants be eliminated <br />Schroeder questioned why this use should be eliminated and inquired if the level of traffic <br />was a factor Gaffron said there were a number of reasons, one of which could be the lack <br />of wanting a fast food restaurant along Hwy 12 Gaffron said it does not mean fast food <br />restaurants are bad, but reasons should be defined as to why this conditional use would <br />not be permitted Lindquist said the committee decided that eliminating the conditional <br />use would eliminate future requests for such uses Schroeder was informed by Gaffron <br />that the B-6 zoning along Hwy 12 only involves the Otten properties and potentially the <br />Willow to Old Cry stal Bay Road area on the north <br />Lindquist asked if there were any public comments <br />John O'Sullivan asked if the reason behind the proposed change to the B-6 was fast-food <br />restaurants or the drive-thru itself He noted another city eliminating fast food restaurants <br />and the change precluded the use by businesses that might have been desirable O’Sullivan <br />said there were certain types of dining that emphasized take out food, and the elimination <br />of drive-thrus would hinder this application, citing examples of LeeAnn Chins, Culver's, <br />and others O'Sullivan said if eliminati''g fast food restaurants was the goal, maybe the <br />definition of fast food needs to be determined. <br />Stoddard said O'Sullivan made a good point in that the Commission cannot change life <br />styles Stoddard suggested retaining the conditional use as only two areas are affected and <br />a reason of lack of accommodating the traffic could be a factor in future applications. <br />Stoddard asked if the areas could not handle the traffic Gaffron said traffic was not <br />necessarily an issue
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.