My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 11,1595 <br />- =i2051 Michael Hi'.beUnk/John Vogt - Continued) <br />Mahusth said there is an issue of »o drin oi tlets on the east side of ie ** <br />Peterman Addition and duected along the lot line to Old Crystal Bay Road. The outlets <br />sene no function and can be closed according to the Engineer. <br />best served by an internal road, one reason of which to move around the forested area. <br />Hurr asked about nvo alternate septic sites shown in a stand oees. Hilbelink said a <br />recondarv site was in the stand of trees with the principal, half m and half out He noted <br />toif a road were to be located to the east, it would be difBcult to 6no two alternate <br />septic sites. <br />” corSfto Cookl'L'^^^ L't!^”s'on thi T'iranteSr <br />ag?.inst the 8% park dedication**. <br />Hurr moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution .i?3601. Ayes j. Nays 0. <br />(#10) #2057 JAMES NYSTROM, 1745 CONCORDIA STREET - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION #3602 <br />The applicant was represented by architect, Greg Frazee. <br />Gaf&on noted that the appUcation is for a number of vanances. The <br />was for an addition located 23' from the lake The Planmng Cotimussion was not m favor <br />of the addition. An amended proposal was presented tor a new ” <br />setback line with a 10' deck encroaching the 0-75' zone. The proposed new garage was <br />proposed at a central location, which would meet setback requirements. Hardcover was <br />Loosed at 10 1% in tne 0-75' zone, 31% in the 75.250' zone, and «,6^; “-5®- <br />500'zone The Planning Commission saw no jusnfication m encroaching the 0-75 zone <br />frith a deck and asked for the house and deck to be <br />side setback was to change from 1 O' to 9.6'. It was noted by the appbeant s architect that <br />any change in the house width would adversely affect the room sizes. <br />configuration of the driveway eliminates a large portion of blacktop. Hurr said she saw <br />no hardship for a side setback variance. <br />.1 <br />L ..
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.