My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
10-21-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:53:05 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 8 6 4.^_____ <br />j.The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on August 21, 1995, <br />and recommended approval of certain requested variances and denial of other <br />requested variances based upon the following findings: <br />B. <br />The lot area and lot width variances should be granted since a residence <br />already exists on the property and no additional land is available for <br />purchase by the applicant to make the lot area and width more conforming. <br />The proposed variance to allow construction of a deck in the 0-75 ’ <br />lakeshore setback zone should be denied because no adequate hardship has <br />been justified to support such a variance. The removal of the existing <br />residence and deck area affords cver>' opportunity and ability to construct <br />a residence and deck meeting the required 75' lakeshore setback, and the <br />relative location and current use of the residence structure on the adjacent <br />property do not provide sufficient hardship to Justify the granting of the <br />requested lakeshore setback variance. <br />The average lakeshore setback variance Ls Justified based on the location of <br />the adjacent house to the north which is extremely distant from ihe lake and <br />therefore creates an average setback line which would force applicant's <br />proposed residence to be similarly distant from the lakeshore, resulting in <br />not one but two residences out of character with the general residential <br />development in the neighborhood. <br />The applicant has proposed to remove the existing detached garage which <br />is 0. r from the south side line and move that garage to a location meeting <br />all setback requirements. <br />The requested variances to allow a side setback of 9.5' on both the north <br />and south side lot lines where a 10' side setback is nonnally required, are <br />Justified by the elimination of the existing 1.6' south side setback by <br />replacing that structure with a new structure meeting 95% of the required <br />setback instead of the existing 16%, and said setback variances are further <br />Justified by the negative impact on room sizes and house layout if the <br />variances are not granted, and the improved location of the residence in <br />relation to lot lines provides further overall Justification for the setback <br />variances. <br />1 <br />Page 2 of 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.