My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
09-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:51:54 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 19, 1996 <br />(#7 - #2161 James and Melissa Easley - Continued) <br />The side setback is proposed at 3' where 10' is required by code The reason for this <br />setback variance is twofold; 1) to add to the drainage by extension of the garage wall to <br />channel drainage past the house, and 2) there are mature trees on the other side. It was <br />noted that there is a 30' setback required for the garage doors facing the street. <br />A lot coverage variance is required The existing structures are 16.8%, or 1401 s.f, <br />where 15% is allowed The proposal is for 19 7?o, or 1646 s.f Gaflron noted that the <br />zoning allows for 1500 s.f regardless of the lot size Calculations have not been done for <br />the conceptual new house and may be found to be less than the existing lot coverage. <br />There will be no change in the hardcover in the 0-75' setback. Existing hardcover is at <br />23.3%, which includes the house and deck The hardcover in the 75-250' setback is at <br />38.1%, proposed at 40.8%, where 25% is allowed. <br />Gaffiron reported that the City Engineer has reviewed the proposal. By channeling the <br />drainage from the garage roof and driveway. Cook was said to feel this would protect the <br />house. Drainage from the street currently travels along a 4-hou5e area. Gaffron said <br />drainage is a concern in the neighborhood, and curb and gutter and retention pond are <br />future issues to be considered. <br />Gaffron asked the Commission to consider the relation of the garage and house, the need <br />for 3-stories, and the view from the lake from a height standpoint at about 50' from lowest <br />to highest points Gaffron noted that a typical 2-story walkout would present a height <br />range of42-45'. Lindquist commented that the problem with the garage was the need to <br />go down 2 stories <br />Architect Susanka raised the issue of the "office space" being considered as part of the <br />garage. When the house is rebuilt in several years, the applicants would need to reside in <br />the garage. Susanka asked if there would be a problem with that as the applicants would <br />not invest heavily into the property if it was not allowed. She also asked about <br />requirements of the planned house in order to gauge what the City would allow. Susanka <br />said the upper story of the garage would have 5-6' sidewalls to allow a person to stand in <br />it but to have minimal impact.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.