My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-16-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
09-16-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2023 11:51:54 AM
Creation date
9/14/2023 11:48:07 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 19, 1996 <br />(#6 - #2160 David Doizenroth - Continued) <br />Smith asked what the use of the addition was for and who would construct it. Dotzenroth <br />said the expansion would allow his vehicles to be stored within and noted that he would <br />contract out for the work Smith asked what the time frame would be for the home <br />completion, garage, and yard cleanup Dotzenroth said the home was started last year, <br />and he is in the process of finishing the roof and walkw ay He thought the home w-ould be <br />completed in a couple months The yard should be cleaned up of construction material at <br />that time Dotzenroth said the garage would be done after the home and all should be <br />completed by spring of 1997 He said all of the work including landscaping will be done <br />within the time frame of the one year variance allotment <br />Hawn asked if the entry to the side could be accomplished without destroying the black <br />walnut tree Dotzenroth said he has not measured it, and it would be close. She asked <br />about the 3-car garage but 2-car design. Dotzenroth said two stalls are tandem. <br />Berg asked if Dotzenroth intended on keeping the sheds on the property Dotzenroth said <br />one of the sheds would be eliminated. <br />Smith asked Dotzenroth for his choice of either the garage pulled back with a side apron <br />or a steeper gabled roof Dotzenroth preferred the roof Smith asked if this was allowed, <br />if Dotzenroth would be willing to orient the garage per the Staff recommendation. <br />Dotzenroth said he would be looking at ice slides. Gaffron noted that this concern could <br />be eliminated by redesigning the peak of the roof and showed Dotzenroth a sketch how <br />that could be accomplished <br />The issue of the garage entry was discussed. Lindquist said the side entry was a matter of <br />safety. Dotzenroth did not think this made a difference with the road being at the end of <br />the point Smith said it would improve the safety, not only for traffic, but for egress onto <br />Casco Point and provide parking safety Dotzenroth asked if he had the door for access <br />but be allowed two on the side. Smith said this would defeat what the Commission was <br />trying to accomplish. <br />Hawn said she was concerned with a variance allowing the garage so close to the roadway <br />when this would not be allowed for others. She does not find the situation to be so unique <br />as to compel approval of the resolution when there is another solution for side entry. She <br />had no problem tvith the steeper roof Smith agreed that the steeper roof would all <br />right. Dotzenroth said he would like to measure the distances to see what effect it would <br />have on the black walnut trees. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Lindquist said he preferred the side door entry. Dotzenroth asked if he could keep the <br />concrete apron for guest parking
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.