11-20-1989 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 ZONING PILE #12fi9-MILL CONTINUED is used to access that lot. Mabusth said if the outlet is created it must be used for access. Mabusth said that the outlet would serve a private driveway to Lot 1, Block 2. The existing access at Old Crystal Bay Road must be eliminated. Chairman Kelley clarified that all three lots would be served with a north/south road extending down to Wear Lane North. Out lot A wo-' Id extend all the way to the north, and the placement of the cul-ua-sac along Outlot A could be variable depending on whether the applicant would like to place the outlot to the east on the north side or south side of the property. Planning Commissioner Bellows questioned how the north/south road would be maintained. She indicated that she could not support the notion of a public road being privately maintained. She said an alternative to that is to serve the subdivision off of Old Crystal Bay Road by its own roadway and its own homeowners association. She suggested that that City would still require the north/south outlot for future extension. Planning Commissioner Hanson indicated that he would prefer that solution to the proposed access through Wear Lane North. Planning Commissioner Brown said that in light of the City's attempt to limit additional access on to County Roads, he was in favor of the interior access roads. Brown said he would like to see the creation of public road that would be publicly maintained with the cul-de-sac the variable on the north/south outlot. It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of the preliminary 3- lot subdivision with access through North Wear Lane, to be a public roadway, maintained by the Public Works Department of the City of Orono. Outlot A should be ^'ontinued to the north lot line of the subdivision and Outlot B should be placed on the south lot line of Loc 1, Blv->ck 2, to access Lot 2, Block 2; existing access off of Lot 2 should be terminated and the existing buildings destroyed within a certain period of time once building commences. Kelley then incorporated City staff's findings and conditions, with the exception of item c, g, and h. Kelley asked who would pay for the additional cost of extending the road to the north at a later time? Mabusth said that bcomes an issue with the variable location of the cul-de-sac. She stated that the City wants that road extended to the north boundary. Kelley said that at this time the applicant would have to go down into the outlot for the previous subdivision and make modifications. Kelley asked why the City could not have that done by the people who want to do it on the north side and come down and connect. Brown said that was the same way they were doing it with Wear's. Bellows asked for clarification regarding the configuration of the road. Bellows also asked about the LjL