Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE PIANMING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 198!> <br />lj;4tZCWING PILE il476>PRASS CONTIN1 <br />Hanson said that if there is no policy in effect, the <br />liability then falls upon the City of Orono and that he would be <br />inclined to recommend denial of this application. <br />Mrs. Brass asked about the use of a mesh pool covering to <br />cover the pool. <br />Kelley suggested that if the Planning Commission recommends <br />denial, that the applicants bring insurance information to the <br />City Council meeting. Kelley said that without the facta <br />pertaining to liability, it is difficult to recommend approval. <br />Mr. Brass said that he was unaware of the need to have such <br />information. <br />Mabusth agreed that the discussion of liability had not been <br />discussed until Planning Commissioner Hanson's comments at this <br />meeting. <br />Mr. Brass said that he preferred not to go to the Council <br />with a recommendation for denial. <br />Kelley asked how long this situation has existed? <br />Mabusth replied that the structure was removed in October, <br />1988. <br />Mrs. Brass said that they were informed of the problem with <br />the accessory structure in September of 1989. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson said that the best he could do <br />under these circumstances was move to table. <br />Mabusth said that the application would be tabled pending <br />^he receipt of insurance information and a recommendation from <br />the applicant as to how he wishes to provide a secure covering <br />over the pool. <br />Bellows added that she would like to see a specific time <br />frame as to when a principal structure will be constructed. <br />Bellows said that the applicant should be aware that the Planning <br />Commission is going to limit the time to re-build and there will <br />be no extension. She said that she was disinclined to allow <br />more than the standard one year period. <br />Council Representative Callahan guestioned whether the <br />Planning Commission really wanted to table this and allow the <br />problem of liability to remain for another two o^ three months? <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if it would be possible to <br />recommend approval subject to the proof of satisfactory liabxlity