Laserfiche WebLink
MIHDTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1470 PARTEM CONTINUED <br />would not be necessary vitU the 2-lot subdivision. Mabusth noted <br />that proceeding with the 2-lot subdivision would leave the issue <br />of accessing the northern properties unresolved. <br />Bellows indicated that she would prefer to see a PRD if <br />there is to be a subdivision of this property. She said that the <br />PRD should not resemble a conventional 3-lot subdivision and that <br />it may be impossible to accomplish that. <br />Kelley asked Bellows if she would accept a PRD that would <br />have the 3 pads on Lot 1 and the septic systems on Lot 2? <br />Bellows said yes she would accept that. <br />Gaffron advised the Planning Commission that there is an <br />existing drainageway running through the property over which it <br />may be necessary for the City to take an easement. Gaffron said <br />that the area for the drainageway would not have to be excluded <br />from the total area if developed as a PRD. <br />Ms. Parten said that she has tried very hard to meet the <br />intentions and directions of the Planning Commission. She said <br />that there are not any big flat areas for clustering homes, but <br />rather there are three separate building areas. <br />Bellows said that the Partens may not be able to do all that <br />they want to do with this property. <br />Ms. Parten said that they would be willing to clean up some <br />of the City's problems with access* She noted that when making <br />this application she had felt confident that due to the fact <br />there are 50 acres with the parcel and surrounding property that <br />will yield no more than 4 lots, approval would not be this <br />difficult. Ms. Parten said that it does not make sense that this <br />parcel cannot be subdivided. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if a determination has <br />been made as to whether easements exist for the northwest lots to <br />cross the Luce Line? <br />Mr. Asao said that he and the Dieters have an easement in <br />the form of a right-of-way from the DNR. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown suggested leaving the Styles' <br />property undeveloped. <br />Mr. Asao said that he had looked at the possibility of <br />purchasing the Stylos’ property which would bring his property up <br />to City standards. <br />Kelley said that would be favorable not only to the City, <br />but it would also require the Partens to put in only a private <br />driveway to serve two houses. Kelley asked for input from the <br />Planning Commission as to the Partens proceeding with a 2-lot