My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1989 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
10-16-1989 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:07:46 AM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:32:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4,a <br />MimiTBS or TUB PLMmiaG COMMISSIOM NSITXBG OCTOBBR 16, 1989 <br />X0H1S6 PILE #1483-COHTBL OP MIHUBSOn COVrili <br />approximately 10' from the street lot line. <br />Planning Commissioner Johnson opined that the impact of the <br />proposed structure was fairly minimal. <br />Kelley recollected that the Planning Commission had asked <br />O.S. West to plant arborvitae around the structure they <br />installed. <br />Mr. Pred Royal# an owner of property across the street from <br />the proposed switching building, said that he had no objections <br />to the building being located as proposed, but he would like to <br />have the building screened from view. <br />Mr. Fred Abrahamson, a representative of the Pairview <br />Covenant Church, explained his dilemma involving the need to <br />obtain the tax forfeit parcel of land upon which the Church <br />recreational area is located. <br />Gaffron clarified that Lot 6 is currently being used by the <br />Church for recreational purposes. Gaffron said that the contract <br />between Contel and Church suggests that Contel will perform some <br />Improvements on property that is currently not owned by the <br />Church. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Johnson, to recommend approval of the setback <br />variances as outlined in the application, provided that <br />appropriate screening and arborvitae be planted along the west <br />and south side of the building and that a landscape plan be <br />sutanitted at the time of Council review. Kelley suggested that <br />the planting requirements be similar to that recommended in the <br />approval of the O.S. West applcation. Mr. Brozlak questioned <br />whether it was necessary to plant arborvitae? Planning <br />Commissioner Johnson suggested that any coniferous tree could be <br />used. Kelley amended his motion to that effect, Johnson <br />seconded. Gaffron inquired as to whether any of the 5 conditions <br />recommended in his memo where to be included in the motion? <br />Kelley replied that he wished to include number 1, revise number <br />3 to require plantings on the west and south of the structure, <br />and Include ;umber 5, Johnson seconded. Motion, Ayes*6, Cohen, <br />Nay, due to his agreement with Mr. McCurdy, and that in his <br />opinion there are other location alternatives. <br />«1464 CHARLBS NADLBR <br />2509 KELLY AVEMUB <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:13 P.M. TO 8:15 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.