My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-1989 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
10-16-1989 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2023 9:07:46 AM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:32:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MITOTBS or ns PIASBISG C0HNI88I0B !TIS6 OCTOBBS IS, 1987 <br />SOnSC PIIB «1470-PARnS COHTIHDBD <br />Johnson raised the question of how the Zoning Code addressed <br />the required contiguous land and the exclusion or inclusion of <br />easements for lots containing 2 and 5 acre minimums. He noted <br />that for 2 acre minimum, dry contiguous buildable area, easements <br />and private drives are excluded. He asked whether that held true <br />for 5 acre lots. <br />Gaffron interpreted the Code to say that 5 acre lots must <br />have a minimum of 2 acre, dry, contiguous, buildable land not <br />located within any right-of-wa^, or other easements. He said <br />that the Code does not specify whether the additional 3 acres <br />are required to be contiguous. <br />Chairman Kelley suggested that the Partens put together a <br />PRD and a lot size variance application. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was continued. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />COTimissioner Johnson, to table this application. Motion, Ayes«7, <br />Nays«>0, Motion passed. <br />«1461 THE RBVBRBMD PAUL N. BBRGGSEH <br />S85 OLD CHTSTAL BAT ROAD SOOTH <br />VARIARCB <br />PUBLICS HSARIHG 7s42 P.M. TO 7>43 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Reverend Berggren was present for this application. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron informed <br />the Planning Commission that this application Involved the need <br />for a side setback variance to construct a porch. <br />Chairman Kelley inquired as to whether the pine trees to the <br />north of the house would remain. <br />Reverend Berggren stated that he did not intend to remove <br />the trees. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if there was any other <br />location for the porch addition? <br />Reverend Berggren said that putting the porch in another <br />location would interfere with the bay window, the septic system <br />or the driveway. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />Reverend Berggren said that he had talked with his neighbor <br />on the north side and he indicated that he had no objections to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.