Laserfiche WebLink
Mimms OP ns piAmiflc comussioh NBnixiG octoipi is, I9t9 <br />S0MIH6 PILB «1470-PA]tT» COaTIPUBD <br />road if they proceeded with a PRD? <br />Planning Cooaniseioners Cohen and Hanson indicated that they <br />would like to see the road at a 50’ width for the entire length. <br />Kelly said that if the applicants proceeded with a PFD. he %’ould <br />like to see the road at a 50 foot width and that access be <br />provided to the nortlieast corner. <br />Mrs. Parten asked whether the road would be private or <br />public? <br />Kelley Indicated that more than likely the road would be <br />private and though the easement would be 50* in width, the road <br />may only be constructed at a 14 or 15 foot width. <br />Mary Petersen asked whether blacktopping of the road would <br />be required? <br />The Planning Commission replied that blacktopping would not <br />be required due to the road having a "private" designation. <br />Ms. Petersen questioned why it was necessary to blacktop the <br />private road constructed within the Foxfyre Subdivision? <br />Gaffron clarified that when a private road serves 3 or more <br />residences, the City has consistently required the road to be <br />paved. <br />Mr. Parten asked j.f, for economical reasons, he could just <br />divide the 2.5 and 10 acres he currently owns and not go ahead <br />with the purchase of the northerly 4.25 acre parcel from Mrs. <br />Styles. <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson replied that it may be that <br />with the easement, there would not be enough land to create 2 <br />lots. <br />Gaffron suggested that perhaps the Reiersgord easement could <br />be reduced from 60' to 50'. <br />Chairman Kelley pointed out that if Mr. Parten proceeds with <br />a PRD for 3 lots, the lots would all be north of the Reiersgord <br />easement. He said that there would not be enough contiguous land <br />to create 3 lots and the applicant would require approval for <br />non-contiguous acreage. Kelley questioned why the Planning <br />Commission could not recommend approval of a 2-lot PRD with non­ <br />contiguous acreage? <br />Bellows noted that the 2-lot PRD would leave Mrs. Styles' <br />parcel landlocked. <br />Chairman Kelley questioned whether it was reasonable to <br />expect Mr. Parten to be responsible for the land locked parcel <br />that currently exists as such?