Laserfiche WebLink
laVOTBS OP THE PIAimiW COMHSSIOH ITIEG JULY 17, 1989 <br />ATYBBAKB 7t00 P.H. <br />The Orono Planning Commlscion met on the above date with the <br />following members present: Chairman Kelley; Planning <br />Commissioners Johnson, Cohen, Brown and Moos. The following <br />represented the City staff: Building and Zoning Administrator <br />Mabusth, Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron, <br />Building t Fire Inspector Jacobs and City Recorder Scheffler. <br />Council Representative Barbara Peterson was also present. <br />*1412 HMnr L. <br />384 MOCOIUT MMU> <br />PRKLUIIHMIT SOBDIVlSIOa CLASS III <br />CCMmaUATIOH OP PUBLIC BBABIHG 7t00 P.M. TO 7tl0 P.N. <br />Mary Petersen was present for this matter, as was Mark <br />Gronberg, her surveyor. <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Mabusth clarified that <br />there Is an additional property owner joining in the plat who <br />will continue to achieve access off of Turnham Road. The four <br />new lots will achieve access from an extended cul-de-sac road <br />that abuts Lot 3. The City has asked for an outlet to connect <br />to Chippewa Lane and to Turnham Road. Also proposed is the <br />definition of an additional outlet for the purpose of accessing <br />the Luce Line. The DNR is asking the City to refrain from <br />intensifying vehicular crossing of the Luce Line. <br />Chairman Kelley suggested that an easement be taken that <br />would allow for pedestrian traffic to access the Luce Line. Such <br />an easement would allow the northern property owners to access <br />the Luce Line without the need to use McCulley Road. <br />Ms. Petersen said that she did not understand why such an <br />easement would be necessary when McCulley Road was so close. <br />Kelley explained that the walking path would allow children a way <br />to the Luce Line without contending with major traffic. <br />Ms. Desyl Peterson, 4385 Chippewa Lane, said that she was <br />pleased to see that Outlot C had been removed. Ms. Peterson <br />noted that another neighbor has been circulating a petition in <br />opposition to the through road. This neighbor was unable to <br />attend this meeting, but Ms. Peterson said that the petition <br />would be submitted prior to review by the City Council. Ms. <br />Peterson asked why Outlot B was being dedicated at this time when <br />Outlot h adequately provides access to the other lots. She <br />suggested that should the other lots subdivide in che future, <br />that outlot could be designated at that time when it would be <br />needed. <br />Mr. Jerome O'Brien, 380 Turnham Road, expressed concern <br />regarding the future through street that Outlot A would provide. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed.