05-15-1989 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OP TBB PlAllMIMG COMMISSION MEETING MAY 15» 1989 SONING FILE «1406-KOMLIH COHTmUED if it was developed. Gaffron noted that ther be through road only if the City or the property owners deemed it necessary. Gaffron said that there was no Intent for a through road in the foreseeable future. Mr. Ray Jaques, owner of Lot 2 in the Trees to Be subdivision, questioned what effect the future development of the larger eastern lot in the Trees to Be plat would have on the potential for the through road being constructed? Gaffron replied that there would be no effect. There were no further c''mments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by Planning Commissioner Bello.vs, to recommend approval of the preliminary subdivision application. Cohen did express concern regarding access onto County Road 84. Motion, Ayes^S, Nays»0, Motion passed. #1407 LEOPOLD HAOSER 475 PBRHDALE ROAD NORTH PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISKW CLASS II PUBLIC HEARING 8:40 P.N. TO 8:50 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. Mr. and Mrs. Hauser were present for this public hearing, as was their realtor, Meredith Howell. Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained that Mr. Hauser was proposing to subdivide his 5.5 acres of property into 2 lots. The Hauser's residence is located on the proposed Lot 1 and would meet the required setbacks. Both primary and alternate septic sites have been determined for the proposed Lot 2. The applicant would prefer to have a separate driveway access to Ferndale Road. However, the City Engineer has recommended that the driveway be shared. He did indicate that sight distance would not be a problem if separate driveways were constructed. The plat would show a 33' right-of-way dedication for North Ferndale Road and the City would ask that a 25' private road out lot along the north end of the property be dedicated. The City Engineer has further recommended that a retention basin be designed for the southwest corner of Lot 2. Mr. Greig commented that he did not believe that Mr. Hauser's proposal would create a problem with drainage. Mrs. Hauser commented that the Keesllng lot line was more contiguous with their property and that drainage would not affect Mr. Greig's property. Mr. Hauser asked if he and Mr. Lauer reach an agreement if he could take the width of the driveway from Lot 1 and add it to Lot 2? Kelley indicated that approval would be conditioned upon