Laserfiche WebLink
maUTBS OF THE PlAimilK: comkissior ITIHG MAT 15» 1989 <br />II HI80HIHG PILE il410-PRIilBAS COMTIH1 <br />across their property as well. Ms. Carol Laquey, the applicants' <br />real estate agent, provided a brief history regarding the <br />easement. She said that once Heritage Drive was put through, <br />there was no longer a need for the easement. She said that the <br />applicants' parcel was designed to access off of County Road 15. <br />She said that if the easement were used, the access wo»’ld be over <br />450* in length. <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows said that she would prefer to <br />see the access occur somevhere other than County Road 15. Ms. <br />Laquey asked if the City would be willing to maintain Railroad <br />Avenue. Bellows replied that this would be no different than any <br />other subdivision and that an outlot designation would be <br />required. Kelley pointed out that the applicants were not <br />subdividing. Bellows commented that in any event, accessing off <br />of County Road 15 was a bad idea. Gaffron said that accessing in <br />another location may interfere with the septic sites. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown questioned whether it would be <br />possible to share a driveway with the Stearns? The Stiernas <br />indicated that they would be in favor of such a proposal. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this application <br />provided that there be no additional access off of County Road <br />15. Mr. Nelson disagreed with such a proposal saying that it <br />made the application contingent upon the neighbors' approval. <br />Motion, Ayes«5, Nays«0, Hanson abstained. (Planning Commissioner <br />Hanson departed at this time). <br />KBVIBIf OP REVISED WORDIIIG - Z(»IIIiG CODE AMENDMEMTS <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen questioned the wording of <br />sections of these amendments for the sake of clarity. <br />In Section 1(c)(2), the heading should be revised to read <br />"Oversized accessory structures are regulated by the following- <br />table:" <br />(Flannina Commissioner Bellows departed at this time.) <br />Section 1(c)(3)(c) should clarify that the covenants and <br />agreement be "in writing". Also, sentence structure with no <br />change in meaning was changed in Section l(c)(3)(c)i and ill. <br />Section 1(c)(4) was revised to refer to any required yard as <br />defined for each zoning district, to clarify the intent and <br />meaning. <br />Section 2 was revised by changing the sentence structure and <br />adding the words "total area", "combined footprint", and "all <br />principal and accessory structures", to clarify the intents and <br />meanings of these phrases. <br />It was moved by Chairma,. ..'elley, seconded by Planning