Laserfiche WebLink
NIMUTBS OP THE PIAUNING CCMMISSKEI MBBTIMG NAY 15, 1989 <br />•J :•< •8«HiIH6 PILF «i399-NCCIILLBT PARM ROMBOUNBRS* ASSOC. CONTIH1 <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconJed by Planning <br />Commissioner Moos, to table this item until such time that the <br />Homeowners' Association comes back before the Planning Commission <br />with a vote. <br />tl400 CHARLES & SANDRA LARSON <br />4285 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING 9t02 P.M. TO 9:10 P.N. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />Mr. and Mrs. Larson were present for this public hearing. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the Larsons were <br />seeking an area variance for an accessory structure 2,225 s.f. <br />Mabusth corrected the lot size to be between 5 to 6 acres. This <br />would allow for a structure 2,200 s.f. in size, based upon the <br />current code amendment. <br />Chairman Kelley said that this matter should be tabled until <br />the City Council made a determination regarding adoption of the <br />Accessory Structure Ordinf ::e Amendment. Mabusth noted that the <br />Amendment would be brought before the Council at their May 22nd <br />meeting. Kelley questioned whether the applicant had been <br />in^^'rmed of the Ordinance Amendment. Mabuoth indicated that her <br />memo, a copy of which was sent to the applicants, contained that <br />information. Mrs. Larson said that she was not aware of the <br />what the Amendment entailed. She asked how the Amendment would <br />affect their application? Mabusth replied that if approved, the <br />Larsons would not need a variance. <br />Mrs. Larson questioned whether a moratorium had in fact been <br />placed on accessory structures, and if so, did it pertain to <br />ac^'essory structures in general or just oversized structures? <br />Mabusth replied that it pertained to accessory structures in <br />general and that she did not know if the City legally had a <br />moratorium until the Council passed an ordinance. Iley <br />Interjected that if the Larsons forced the issue and req sted <br />the Planning Commission to act on their application, he 3uld <br />deny it. He asked Mrs. Larson if she preferred to ha . the <br />Planning Commission table the application or vote to re« mmend <br />approval or denial. Mrs. Larson replied that they could table <br />the application. <br />There were no comroentr from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Cohen, to table application #1400. Motion, Ayes=6, <br />Nays^O, Motion passed.