Laserfiche WebLink
maons op thb piAmiac coioussioa mbbtimg appil 17, 1989 <br />SOaiK FILE «132C-NATIATA COOMTBT CLUB <br />Mr. Downey said that the Country Club has been trying to <br />cosply with the requests from the City. He asked that the City's <br />jfequest for an additional 8' easement for the outlot be <br />addressed. Kelley asked him how he would address the concerns <br />expressed by Mr. Greig^ Mr. Hauser and Mr. Simmons. Mr. Downey <br />said that it was his understanding that Mr. Lauer intended to <br />leave most of the property in a natural state. Mr. Downey said <br />that once the subdivision is approved, the drainage problem would <br />become Mr. Lauer's responsibility. Planning Commissioner Johnson <br />interjected that it was his understanding chat the Golf Course <br />would participate in the construction of the retention pond. <br />Mr. Simmons said that he did not understand how the <br />subdivision could be approved without the City reviewing the <br />actual house plans. Kelley concurred with Mr. Simmons adding <br />that since this was such a sensitive area, it would be important <br />to have more Information as to the feasibility of what is being <br />proposed. He said the fact that the City Engineer has revised <br />his plan twice makes him even more leary. <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen said that he had understood that <br />Mr. Lauer was building a "spec" house, and did not intend to live <br />on the property. Cohen further expressed his concern over the <br />construction destroying the private road which serves his <br />property. He was also concerned about the access being located <br />so close to the Golf Course. Mr. Lauer indicated that at this <br />time he had not made a final decision as to whether he would live <br />on the property or sell it. <br />Mr. Brooke Nelson said that he had seen previous <br />subdivisions approved and conditions changed after-the-fact that <br />impacted surrounding properties. He wanted something more <br />definite presented to him before this subdivision was approved. <br />Kelley asked Gaffron what specific requirements should be <br />requested from the applicant prior to proceeding with development <br />of this property. Gaffron said that City Staff would like to see <br />the retention basin design reviewed and approved by the City <br />Engineer. Gaffron said that the remainder of this application <br />could be presented to the Council, unless the Planning Commission <br />preferred to have the matter come back before them again. Kelley <br />asked if the actual grading plan for the proposed house would be <br />provided. Mr. Lauer said that he had a 100' x 40' square in <br />which the house is to be built so the grading plan can be <br />determined. <br />Kelley said that since the footprint and slxe of the house <br />will be known, the runoff can be determined. He would like to <br />see specific plans for grading and the retention pond on not only <br />Mr. Lauer's property, but the Wayzata Country Club property as <br />well. Kelley said that the City would take a flowage and <br />conservation easement across the pond. Kelley said that by <br />taking the easement, the City can go in and remedy any problems <br />with the pond and assess the costs involved back to the property