Laserfiche WebLink
foiow or m pia»ii6 comossioh nbbtisg awl it, irsr <br />•13ft STBWn KWBLLS <br />144t PABE OKIVB <br />COaDITIOIAL OSB PBBMIT/VABIABCB <br />PUBLIC BBABIBG lOtlO P.N. TO lOtlS P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The Bowella were present for this natter. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Adninistrator Gaffron <br />explained that the property in question is a through lot, having <br />roadways located in the front and rear. An accessory structure <br />on a through lot requires a conditional use pernlt. The <br />applicants are proposing to construct a 6* wood fence along <br />County Road 19 and 4* green chain link as the fence heads back <br />into the property toward the house. The codes will allow a 4* <br />fence along a county road or a najor thoroughfare abutting a <br />lakeshore lot but not an inland lot such as this. Gaffron said <br />the wain reason for the Howells requesting the fence is to <br />protect their children fron the road traffic without the need for <br />constant supervision. <br />Planning Counissioner Coh^n asked the applicants if they <br />would have a prcblem making the fence a consistent height all the <br />way around. Mrs. Howell said that would be no problem, but they <br />would prefer a consistent 6*. Hanson asked if they were seeking <br />noise reduction? Mr. Howell replied on the side abutting County <br />Road 19, noise was a problem. Chairman Kelley suggested that the <br />fence be 6* along County Road 19 and 3-1/2* for the remainder. <br />Mrs. Howell replied that their 19 month old daughter could easily <br />get over a 3-1/2* fence. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson, to recommend approval of a 6* fence <br />around the property given the location of the property in <br />relation to County Road 19. The applicant said that he would <br />prefer to have the fence 6* high along County Road 19 and 4* high <br />around the remaining area. Planning Commissioner Cohen revised <br />his motion to reflect the applicants* preference, Hanson <br />seconded. Motion, Ayes>6, Nay8**0, Motion passed. <br />QRDIBABCB AMBHDMBHT-GOBFIBN DATE OP SPBCIAL MBBTIBG <br />It was agreed that May 1, 1989 would be dated for the <br />Special Meeting to discuss the Ordinance Amendment. <br />JOIBT PLABHIH6 C0MU8810B/C0UBCIL MBBTIBG <br />TB0B8OAT, NAT 4, 1989 TOPICS POB AGENDA <br />PLABBIBG COMMISSION APPBOVAL OP MARCH 20, 1989 MINDTBS* <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Johnson, to approve the Planning Commission Minutes <br />of the March 20, 1989 Meeting. Motion, Ayes^S, Nays«0, Motion <br />passed.