01-17-1989 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JANUARY 17, 1989 ZOanK PILE fl334-RBBBRS CORINDED entirely, if that issue could be addressed in the final homeowner document. Kelley asked whether the Planning Commission would see the homeowner document? Mabusth replied that the Planning Commission would see the subdivider’s agreement and the covenants. Kelley rescinded his portion of the motion pertaining to accessory structures. Brown seconded. Motion, Ayes»6, Johnson, Nay due to his preference not to restrict the subdivision any further by increasing the sideyard setbacks; Motion passed. *1359 DAVID LlflDSTROM 1315 WOODHILL AVBHUB VARIAHCBS PUBLIC HEARIB6 8s05 P.N. “ 8:20 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were duly noted. The applicants were present for this matter, as was Mr. Steve Sather, the applicants* developer. Zoning Administrator Mabusth informed the Planning Commission that an amended site plan had been submitted showing the proposed deck location to be on the east side of the property. The street setback, originally thought to be required, will not be necessary. The only variance required will pertain to the separation setback required between the garage and porch addition. Chairman Kelley's opinion was that the garage should be attached to the addition. Mr. Sather explained that could not be done due to the garage having a floating foundation. It would also limit the size and purpose of adding the porch. The applicants are trying to have an open room and minimize looking out the back wall of the house into the garage and maintain a porch-like atmosphere. Planning Commissioner Brown asked whether the addition could be located on another side of the house? Mabusth explained that there was steep topography and the septic system that limited expansion to the east. The location of the well on the west side would prevent expansion in that direction. Planning Commissioner Bellows asked why the mud room and porch could not be interchanged? Jane Delaney explained that such an arrangement would not fit in with the present layout of the house. Mr. Sather gave a brief explanation of the floor plan of the existing house. Bellows believed that there were other alternatives to this proposal. Planning Commissioner Johnson concurred with the applicants regarding the limited area in which the porch could be built. Brown concurred with Johnson. Kelley stated that one of the hardships would be the garage located on a floating slab. Mabusth explained that such a