Laserfiche WebLink
MIKUTES op the planning commission meeting JANUARY 17, 1989 <br />II .-IIICmiWG FILE «1365-SCHHBIDBR COETIMl <br />that if the Planning Commission declined the duplex use, they may <br />act on the application immediately. If the matter were tabled, <br />Mr. Schneider would bring the matter back with * e lot line <br />rearrangement. <br />Bellows commended everyone in attendance for the way in <br />which they presented their concerns and facts involving this <br />issue. She believed that the first order of business was to <br />determine whether a duplex use was an intensification of use of <br />the property. Kelley observed that should a duplex use be <br />approved# a 4—car ^ara^® would be put on Lot 5. Hanson inquired <br />as to the zoning for the Art Center Building. Mabusth stated <br />that it was RR-IB, Rural Residential, with conditional use <br />permits for school use and a non-conforming use for the food <br />service. Johnson asked whether there would be a conditional use <br />permit reguired for the duplex? Mabusth answered affirmatively. <br />Bellows stated that the intensification of use must be based upon <br />the zoning classification. <br />Chairman Kelley stated that in his opinion, he could not see <br />a duplex in that area. Brown concurred. Cohen stated that he <br />did not like rental property there. Johnson stated that <br />initially he agreed with the "Hillegass group". He now felt that <br />if the building must be sold, it must be sold, but wanted to see <br />it historically preserved. Brown stated that he could not see <br />the hardship for the duplex use. Bellows concurred. The <br />remaining Planning Commissioners concurred by stating that either <br />they could not see the hardship or they did not like the aspect <br />of rental property in that location. Mabusth advised that the <br />code does not prohibit rental of a single-family residence. <br />Mr. Schneider asked that this matter be tabled to allow him <br />more time to investigate the opinions of the adjacent property <br />owners. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Cohen, seconded by <br />Chairman Kelley, to table this item. Motion, Ayes®7, Nays*0, <br />Motion passed. <br />PLAMMIliG COMMISSION APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Johnson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson, to approve^ the Minutes of the <br />November 21, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting. Motion, Ayes«7, <br />Nays^O, Motion passed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />It was agreed that Planning Commission member, James Hanson, <br />would represent the Planning Commission at the February 13, 1989 <br />City Council Meeting.