My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-17-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
06-17-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:21:07 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:17:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION’ <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 20, 1996 <br />(^2 - #2112 Richard Putnam - Continued) <br />Putnam added that the deck uas falling dox^n, and he could not wait for variance approval <br />to receive the permit before reconstructing the deck <br />There were no public comments <br />Smith commented that if the deck had not already been replaced, the Plannimz <br />Commission would livik for additional areas for reduction of hardcover GatTron said it <br />might be argued that the de^’c replacement is a continuation of work that was authorized <br />in 1987 He noted the pavers and rock walls were appropriate, and the width of the <br />driveway was necessary Smith askto if the replacement was part of the past resolution <br />h was not, but it could be argued that it possibly was based on the wordinu <br />Hawn moved. Lindquist seconded, to recommend approval of Application #2112 per the <br />Staffs recommendation Vote AvesNavsO <br />Putnam asked to comment on the Casco Point area bringing the Commissioners attention <br />to the plat map in Exhibit B He note-J that although the area was zoned foi L2 acre lots. <br />100' min.mum width, and related setbacks, only 5 or 6 of the lots on the plat meet the 100' <br />width Putnam said most of the lots do not meet the existing zonim t codes, and he sees no <br />merit to the codes as they exist He does not understand the need for applicants to request <br />variances when the ordinances do not work for the properties on Casco Point. Putnam <br />noted that the homes in the area are not tear downs He said Casco Point was a diverse <br />area, unique, and he is irritated by the social engineering caused by the bureaucracy, and <br />the waste of time and mone> spent in gaining approval for such projects as his deck <br />replacement. Putnam said others were not coming in to the City for review of projects but <br />doing work without permits, adding that the process was not working <br />Smith commented about requesting reductions in hardcover and justitlcation of existing <br />hardcover. <br />Putnam said the taxes were outrageous for the area and felt people were treated poorly. <br />He saw the issue as being a double slandaid between lakeshore and non-lakeshore <br />properties. Putnam asked that the Staff be allowed more flexibility in situations such as <br />what exists on Casco Point <br />Peterson said he understood the frustration He noted the problem with property owners <br />building more than what is allowed for the lot sizes <br />Putnam asked that the City tell the County to put a "throttle" on taxes He acknowledged <br />the job well-done by Staff in his dealings w ith the City in his remodeling, and asked the <br />Commis'.on to address these issues as soon as possible.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.