07-15-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMNflSSION MEETING HELD ON JUN-E 17. 1996 (#6 - #2141 Roberta Roth - Continued) Smith asked if the shed was to be removed. The applicant said it would be UTien asked where the items in the shed would go, the applicant said there was 9' of storage on one side of the proposed garage and 5' on the front. The applicant said one car w ould be sitting outside. There were no public comments. Smith moved, Lindquist seconded, to approve the side street setback variance for the 16'x20’ garage and removal of the shed Vote: Ayes 7, Nays 0 (#7) #2142 ANGELA WOODHOUSE, 2625 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING - 8:15-S:28 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted The Applicant was present along with Scott Gikling Mabusth reported that the property is located on North Shore Drive, and the majority of the residence is within the 0-75' setback The proposed improvement requires lakeshore setback, average lakeshore, and hardcover variances The improvements include a two story addition at 6'x23’ to the west side of the 2 story home, a new side entry with stoop, a realigned stairway, and a bay addition at lakeshore The upper level would allow an additional bedroom A 17.S s f bay currently exists and a 52 s f bay addition is proposed Elevations were shown Both structures encroach the average lakeshore with the west addition 21' in front of the average lakeshore setback and 42' from the lakeshore. The bay is located 23' in front of the average lakeshore setback and 39-1/2' from the lakeshore. The existing structure is 21' from the shoreline. The improvements would increase the hardcover in the 0-75' setback bv 193.8 s.f or 0.905^. Peterson commented that the variance is a result of the entire home being located in the 0- 75' setback. Mabusth said the increases are a result of the new entry and stoop and would be considered minor if the home was not in the 0-75' setback. She added that the house was centrally located on the 280’ wide lot, and there was no visual impact on the lake view of the adjacent residences. Lindquist asked if the 193 s f w as all in the 0-75' setback. Mabusth said it was and recommended removal of a boat house with deck Lindquist said any hardcover increase would require a decrease in the 0-75' setback