07-15-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f:r Zoning File #2151 July 10, 1996 Page 4 2. Angling of residence to minimize impact of lake views of adjacent residences, 3. Need to have a driveway with a turnaround so as to discourage backing out onto busv Casco Point Road. 4.Limited area within 250-500' setback area. 5. Property meets required lot standards of the LR-IC zoning district. 6. Applicant states large grassed lakeshore yard will help absorb runoff from additional hardcover. Issues for Consideration 1.Applicant should clarify if there is an upper level deck at the southwest comer of stmeture. There is a conflict with the floor plans and elevations. Exhibits 1-1-2 show a lakeside deck and floor plans of main level do not reveal the deck, neither do the liardcovcr facts within the 75-250' setback area - applicant should clarify. 2.^Tiat is the Planning Commission's response to architect's position regarding landsc£q)ed areas underlain with plastic? Must landscape areas be underlain with plastic? (983.5 s.f. or 6.2% in 75-250' setback area, 132.5 s.f. or 1.4% in 250-500' setback area) 3.How do we respond to Mr. Grundeen ’s concerns (Exhibit F) who asks that all new construction meet the average lakeshore setback? He notes potential impact upon lakeshore setbacks for his property and the property to the south of the Grundeen property should future additions be proposed to the lakeside of their residences. 4.Will Planning Commission members recommend approval of variances for new construction? Do the hardships support request to encroach average lakeshore setback line and install hardcover excesses? Planning Commission options are as follows: A.New constmetion to meet average lakeshore setback line, this would exclude grade level patios. B.All new constmetion shall not extend beyond setback line of existing residence. Applicant's architect must provide survey locating existing structures in order to establish footprint of new stmeture. i