08-19-1996 Planning Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i Zoning File #2151 August 13, 1996 Page 3 Review of Amended Proposal Staff has discussed the amended proposal with both the neighbor to the north, Mrs. Erickson, and the neighbor to the immediate south, Mr. Grundeen. Both have advised that they approve the revised plan as presented to the Planning Commission (Exhibit B). As of this writing, staff has yet to receive their written notification but have promised to submit letters by your meeting date. Mr. Theilmann, the neighbor to the immediate south of the Grundeen property, has received a copy of the amended proposal and was also present at meetings with appliciints and applicants' architect. As of this writing, 1 have yet to receive a phone call or receive written comments from Mr. Theilmann. As already noted in the earlier review, the subject property meets the required area and width standards for the LR-IC zoning district Structural coverage is once again not of issue proposed at 11.9%. Hardcover in the 75-250' setback area does not exceed the allowed 25% with the inclusion of the area of the boat house at 23.4%. The principal structure will encroach the average lakeshore setback line by 7'. The existing principal structure encroaches the average lakeshore setback line by 20' (grade level addition with two floors of upper level decks). Review Exhibits C, D and F, a grade level enclosed porch with main level deck at northw est comer encroaches the average setback line by 13' and the remaining portion of the main level deck at the southwest comer encroaches the line by 15'. Refer to Exhibit A, the area of the lot has been adjusted to reflect the reduction of the right-of-w'ay of Casco Point Road. This reduction in area has had a major impact on the hardcover level within the 250-500' setback area. Hardcover was originally proposed at 45.7% and is now proposed at 38.9%. The area reduction has intensified the hardcover variances requested in this setback zone. Issues for Consideration 1.Will you approve a variance to the average lakeshore setback line? If stmeture at this size is moved further east, this will place more of the principal structure within the 250-500' setback area where excesses already exist. The residence will be located 180'-r from the shoreline per revised plan. The lot averages 350' in depth. If a setback variance is to be granted, is this an acceptable compromise? 2.There is an excess of 8.9% hardcover in the 250-500' setback area as more of the principal structure has been moved into the 250-500' setback area. The property is allowed a total of 6,178.5 s.f (75-250' = 3,937.5 s.f; 250-500' = 2.241 s.f) of hardcover improvements. Applicants propose a total of 6,605.5 s.f of hardcover improvements (includes 400 s.f. of boat house). Should principal structure be reduced in area proposed at 3,176.3 s.f? Can proposed structural or non-structural improvements be reduced or eliminated? Can car walk