My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:12:54 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:07:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COxMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JULY 15, 1996 <br />(#3 - #2135 Paul and Sue HedlundUdna Albee Estate - Continued) <br />Lindquist moved, Stoddard seconded, to approve Application #2135 with the <br />understanding that a grading plan for the bluff area be presented prior to the application <br />going before the Council A minimum of a 1500-2000 gallon tank would be required for <br />pumping and the drainfield would be disconnected Variances for a street setback of 8’, <br />hardcover, and average lakeshore setback were recommended Vote; Ayes 5, Nays 1, <br />Peterson (to be consistent with his policy to vote against average lakeshore setback <br />variances). Peterson noted the improvements made to the plan and said the proposal is <br />consistent with the other homes in the neighborhood The application will be presented at <br />the August 12 Council meeting. <br />(#4) #2148 WAYNE M. HOLMES AND JACKIE DAHL, 1390 PARK DRIVE - <br />VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING 7:54-7:59 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The applicants was present <br />Mabusth reported that their original proposal was to restore the majority of the house and <br />add a new second story The applicants found that the foundation would not support the <br />new second story and now propose to raze the structure and install a new residence. The <br />property is located in the 1 acre zoning district The lot width is met as well as all <br />setbacks. A lot area v ariance is required. No negative comments have been received from <br />any neighboring property owners. <br />Peterson saw the application in the light of a formality due to code restrictions. He did <br />voice concern over a cistern on the property and asked that it's remov'al or abandonment <br />be attached as a condition of the application. The existing well is to be relocated, and the <br />existing well will need to be abandoned. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Mabusth noted that the applicant's have asked to have the application presented at the July <br />22 Council meeting. <br />Peterson moved, Berg seconded, to approve Application #2148 w ith the addition of the <br />removal of the cistern and existing well. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.