My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1996
>
08-19-1996 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2023 3:12:54 PM
Creation date
9/13/2023 3:07:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File <^2160 <br />August 15, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />Summary of Request <br />Applicants propose two additions to the existing garage which is located less than 1’ from the <br />street lot line and from 4.4' to 7.4' from the side lot line. The existing garage has doors which <br />face Casco Circle, leaving virtually no room for parking in front of the garage other than <br />within the right-of-way. Currently, additional parking is in a graveled area directly adjacent <br />to the garage. <br />Applicants propose to construct a 24' x 16' addition to the rear of the existing garage, and <br />replace the existing 8:12 pitch roof with a steeper 12:12 pitch roof, enclosing some storage <br />space. Applicant has indicated he does not propose to move the garage stall doors to the side <br />as shown on the construction elevation views, but intends to leave the doors facing the street. <br />The existing garage is non-conforming from the perspective that with doors facing the street <br />it should be 30' from the street lot line and 10' from the side lot line. The proposed garage <br />will in many respects be even more non-conforming because the added size places it into a <br />categoiy (750-1,000 s.f.) which requires a 15' side setback. <br />Discussion <br />Applicant has indicated in his supplementar>' information letter (E.xhibit E) that the existing <br />garage is a sound structure with proper frost footing foundation, and that the costs to tear it <br />down and start over in the location meeting the setback requirements would be cost-prohibitive. <br />Further, he notes that a large 4' diameter maple tree would be lost if the entire structure w'as <br />moved to meet the required setbacks. The garage addition as proposed will be approximately <br />12' from the base of that tree. <br />The existing garage has an Id' concrete apron between the garage doors and the traveled <br />surface of Casco Circle. While this leaves room to park two full size cars without extending <br />into traffic, all of that parking is within the right-of-way. The reason the City Code requires <br />a 30' street lot line setback for garage doors facing the street, is to allow substantial off-street <br />parking outside of the right-of-way. Given the relatively narrow width of pavement on Casco <br />Circle, it would be in the best interests of the City to decrease parking within the right-of-way. <br />And, technically per Municipal Code Section 8.20, parking vehicles between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 <br />a.m. upon any public street (defined as the right-of-way) is prohibited. Obviously, this has not <br />been enforced in most neighborhoods. <br />Further, Zoning Code Section 10.61, Subd. 5 (A) indicates that within residential districts, "All <br />vehicles normally owned or kept by the occupants on the premises must have a garage stall <br />or open parking space on the same lot as the principal use served...". Also, Subd. 4 "Purpose <br />of Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements", states that "regulation of off-street parking <br />and loading spaces in this chapter is to alleviate or prevent congestion of the public right-of- <br />way and so to promote the safety and general welfare of the public by establishing minimum
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.