Laserfiche WebLink
#2159 - Jundt <br />August 14, 1996 <br />Page 2 <br />located just above the shoreline and about 150' south of the boat house; and a narrow stairway <br />traversing the slope approximately 100' north of the boat house, and which is virtually hidden and <br />unused at this time but also proposed for renovation. <br />The work proposed on the stairways is relatively minor in nature, and includes leveling and resetting <br />the existing stair slabs ^lus replacing the existing metal handrails with a new decorative cast <br />aluminum handrail. The hidden stair vay further north is also proposed to be leveled and reset It <br />appears that w ith some minor work near the shoreline the northerly stair system would connect to <br />the flat terrace area on which the boat house is located (see Exhibit H). <br />Secondly, applicants propose to make major repairs to the existing "boat house”. This structure is <br />in poor condition, likely due to a failing (or lacking) foundation. 7 he f*roposed yvork includes; <br />replacement of existing shingle roof yvith neyv cedar shakes and new eyebroyv <br />yvindoyy <br />- replace and modify virtually all existing yvindoyvs and doors <br />• replumb existing structural frame and reclad with new clapboard siding <br />- pour a new concrete floor <br />add a new concrete step <br />After discussion with the Building Inspections Department, it yvould appear to staff that this structure <br />is being visually rebuilt from the ground up, absent saving the interior framing. This building is <br />actually not a "boat house" in the sense that it would shelter a ooat, but is merely a small storage <br />building. It has no apparent architectural significance. City codes regarding such non-conforming <br />structures limit the degree of alloyvable repairs to 50% of the building's value at the time it became <br />non-conforming (1975 or earlier). In this case the needed structural yyoil. ould appear to <br />substantially exceed its current and former value (old City assessor’s records uo not even list this <br />building, much less establish a value for it). <br />The giotto structure is of a someyvhat different character, hoyvever. It is essentially an underground <br />room, built into the hillside and faced yvith a rock retaining wall. Its function has not been discussed <br />by the applicants but the yvork proposed for it is mainly cosmetic, including: <br />adding stucco interior yvall and ceiling panels <br />adding a decorative light fixture <br />restoration of existing wood doors <br />- restoration of the cxibliiig sioiie iciaining yvall